English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Lets assume all other traits are equal.

2006-08-21 09:01:43 · 84 answers · asked by kuteguy1977 1 in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

84 answers

I'd prefer a stable, less attractive man as long as he loves me with all his heart. Looks aren't everything. =)

2006-08-21 09:06:35 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Stable less attractive man, but in the long run looks don't matter anyway... It's the person on the inside that counts. The ability to love and appreciate someone is what makes a man attractive...

Just my opinion :)

2006-08-21 09:14:33 · answer #2 · answered by ohiochik28 1 · 0 0

Well, in 15 years, the stable man will probably still be stable, but the attractive one might not be attractive, so I'm going with stable.

2006-08-21 09:08:08 · answer #3 · answered by mikah_smiles 7 · 0 0

My theory is the wrapping paper may look pretty outside the box, but it is what is revealed inside that matters most. So, I guess my answer would be less attractive but who is to define the meaning of attractivness. Just like the old say goes "Beuty is in the eye of the beholder". As far as finacials go if the only reason a person dates some one is for there finacial stability, then they are an undeserving person. There is no real answer for this question. But, a morally right person would be with there partner due to chemistry, love for that person etc.

2006-08-21 09:10:26 · answer #4 · answered by pattiof 4 · 0 0

What does attractiveness have to do with anything if you were grown up you would look from the same point of view we do that it's not what's on the outside but what's on the inside that counts.. And as far as him being stable that's always a plus but it don't always work that way..

2006-08-21 09:09:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

By "attractive" I assume you mean "physically handsome". If so, I'm sticking to the stable guy. Personally, though, attraction can happen for any reason regardless of looks, so maybe the "less atrractive" guy is less attractive for a different reason than looks.

2006-08-21 09:07:27 · answer #6 · answered by Milana P 5 · 0 0

Stable Less Attractive...remember that beauty fades, Second beauty is in the eye of the beholder, whats attractive 2 me, might not be 2 u...

2006-08-21 09:08:00 · answer #7 · answered by Nay Nay 3 · 0 0

Stable less attractive man.

Looks are not everything to me, just a bonus if they go with a good personality and respectful traits.

2006-08-21 09:06:50 · answer #8 · answered by Dolphin lover 4 · 0 0

Assuming all other traits are equal, I go for the stable man.

2006-08-21 09:06:33 · answer #9 · answered by shirley_corsini 5 · 0 0

Non stable but attractive. What can I say? I find looks more appealing than money, and if the personalitys the same why not?

2006-08-21 09:13:09 · answer #10 · answered by emailcrystalknapp 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers