English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

I wouldn't think so, but here is an alternative name for em, how about calling them,
tiddlely winks.

2006-08-21 03:31:12 · answer #1 · answered by kekeke 5 · 0 0

No, when it was named only men were accessing them. A better question to ask everybody is why manhole covers are round. I ask that at every job interview I give. Some interviewees look scared.

2006-08-21 10:29:37 · answer #2 · answered by Velociraptor 5 · 0 0

No coz at the time it was a hole for workmen to use to get into the sewers, times have changed but them name has stuck, it isn't MAN-HOLE a mans hole but MANHOLE a sewer cover!

2006-08-21 10:30:28 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

Is calling a Ladybird a ladybird sexist, if it is an fact male?
Oh dear, now U've opened a Pandora's box, huh?

2006-08-21 10:28:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

better question........was a manhole named a manhole, after the smell. or the hole?

2006-08-21 10:28:59 · answer #5 · answered by rock 4 · 0 0

Try calling it a womanhole.

When you wake up in the hospital, we will try to explain were you went wrong. After we stop laughing of course!

2006-08-21 10:28:28 · answer #6 · answered by tallerfella 7 · 1 0

No because, what woman in her right mind would want to go down there! Leave that to the men.

2006-08-21 10:29:46 · answer #7 · answered by dandelionsoup 3 · 0 0

No it is not sexist, but it is not politically correct either. You should call them person holes.

2006-08-21 10:29:10 · answer #8 · answered by Michael 5 · 0 0

no its only called that because working in the sewer is a mans job right

2006-08-21 10:29:46 · answer #9 · answered by the ole ball and chain 4 · 0 0

psshh no, but seriously everything is sexist now a days. Be careful what you think.

2006-08-21 10:29:42 · answer #10 · answered by staylowsaylo 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers