Why is it foolish to believe that no gods exist in reality?

Question

People sometimes like to quote the biblical passage that goes "The fool says in his heart there is no god" (or words to that effect).

It would indeed be foolish if there were any justifiable reason to believe that a god exists. However, no-one in all of human history has ever come up with one single valid argument for the existence of any gods, nor one solitary item of objective evidence. It's not foolish to disbelieve an idea which is supported by neither argument nor evidence - on the contrary, it's the only reasonable position to take. That's why the more intelligent you are, the less likely you are to be religious.

andy c: I see you have no argument or evidence either.

Answer 1

ITS NOT

Answer 2

That is, by far, the most insane thing I've ever read. How you could believe that intelligence = faith in any way, shape, or form is beyond me.

For every point you make, a valid counterpoint could be made. It is obvious that you're an educated man, yet you seem to take an inordinate amount of pleasure in trying to disprove the existence of God.

All individuals' beliefs are formed in large part through their sociological upbringing and, regardless of your own beliefs, you should leave well enough alone.

You cannot prove, nor can you disprove, the existence of God. Belief in God is based solely on faith. Believing that this world is all there is happens to be a severely depressing thought. With all the evil and pain that this world contains, having faith that there is something more out there keeps many people from losing their minds.

Many people talk about Christians being too fervent in spreading their dogma to the world. In your case, you are equally as guilty of pushing your opinions off as the only true and valid ones in existence.

Bottom line is this - Is there even the remotest possibility that you could be wrong? You very well may be right, maybe God doesn't exist. I don't think you're foolish for believing that - it's your belief. What I find foolish is that you would waste your time worrying about what others believe in instead of just living your own life.

Answer 3

genuinely you're misinformed. in reality it truly is been prevalent because the 1790s. Luigi Galvani confirmed that chemical reactions particularly do proceed to take position after medical "lack of existence". in case you probably did some study instead of only making pretend and unsupported assertions you may want to stumble on that we've prevalent for 2 hundred years that the cells of your body take more beneficial than some hours to completely die or end to operate. this may be shown via taking muscle tissues out of a lifeless organism (like from a frog's leg for instance) and stimulating it with electrical energy from a flashlight battery very reminiscent of Galvani did. The muscle will settlement a lifeless ringer for even as it became alive and area of a residing creature because the cells are nevertheless waiting to have chemical reactions it truly is what motives the contraction in step with the stimulus.

Answer 4

"That's why the more intelligent you are, the less likely you are to be religious" - like Einstein?

Since you've not been in contact with everyone "in all human history", don't you think your assumption, stated as fact, is a bit presumptious? That history does not record it (and this too is an assumption, there are -many- books I've yet to read, as I assume is true of you, unless you also claim to have read all the books) does not mean it never occurred.

I'm afraid this argument does not stand up to scrutiny (others might, but not this one).

Answer 5

The only thing we know about deities with any certainty is that the number of them is a whole number, the idea of a fractional deity being frankly absurd. So the number of deities in our universe is an integer, in the range from minus infinity to plus infinity. (We leave the theologians to interpret a negative number of deities: this is number theory, and its conclusion should save them the trouble.)

For it is commonly accepted that we should expect our universe to be typical of possible universes. So the expected number of deities is in the middle of the range of possibilities. That is, zero. Quod erat demonstrandum.

Answer 6

One day two swindlers came to the emperor's city. They said that they were weavers, claiming that they knew how to make the finest cloth imaginable. Not only were the colors and the patterns extraordinarily beautiful, but in addition, this material had the amazing property that it was to be invisible to anyone who was incompetent or stupid.

Answer 7

to call someone foolish just because they disagree with you is indeed foolish.

to say that their is no evidence for a Creator is as well.


The question is dose that evidence meet the burden of proof. To answer that one first needs to define the limit of burden of proof. people being different and objective by nature they have different burdens of proof for different things. Hence why people believe in different things.

Answer 8

Hitchhikers guide to the galaxy - babel fish - if you don't want pop culture answers the bible says God made it plain to see that his creations point to him (Psalm 19:1-3, romans 18 : something.

EVERY culture has a God - every one - ever wonder why that is?

part two - most cultures have dragons - think dinosaurs walked with man?

Answer 9

Ever since the creation of the world his eternal power and divine nature, invisible though they are, have been understood and seen through the things he has made. So they are without excuse.

Answer 10

if god realy exists then all of the s.hit that people go through would not exist but it does eg
war, rape, murders all of that s.hit and i have been through alot in my life and if god existed then i cannot see what i have done to deserve all of the s.hit that i have been through
thanks

Answer 11

it's not foolish.. it's a valid possibility