Why don't they leave them out of it? Or are they using them just like some use anchor babies?
2006-08-20 20:20:11 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Yes, I am sure it does cause the children stress. You answered your own question. Yes, they are using them same as they use their children as anchor babies.
2006-08-20 20:24:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes it does but it goes the same for both sides.And I think it promotes racial tension.Like the schools don't have enough problems with gang violence in schools.As to why they don't leave them out of it,its because all parents think they are right.On the pro immigration side they think they are teaching their children to be proud of their heritage and stand up for rights that belong to them.And on the anti immigration side they believe they are teaching them to stand up against something they don't agree with and against invaders that are stealing their future,when in reality I bet none of the kids really understand what all the adults are protesting over.
2006-08-22 01:09:22 · answer #2 · answered by Nexus K 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WASHINGTON -- For nearly 140 years, any child born on U.S. soil, even to an illegal immigrant, has been given U.S. citizenship. Now, some conservatives in Congress are determined to change that.
A group of 92 lawmakers in the House will attempt next week to force a vote on legislation that would revoke the principle of "birthright citizenship," part of a broader effort to discourage illegal immigration.
2006-08-21 03:45:17 · answer #3 · answered by ibelieve 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They have taught their youth for the past 30 years it is their birthright to take over the United States and including them now is only to reinforce their plans.
Even yesterday a reverend in Riverside NJ protest for illegals stated that he would personally see to it that only Latinos purchase property in that city so that 'Riverside will be ours'. How many laws can you think of that he would have to break to make that come true?
It is through criminal activity and bad law - that is their weapon and why not - why shoot people when you can capitulate them through law.
Genius - but deadly.
2006-08-21 04:47:11 · answer #4 · answered by yars232c 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, can't understand your question. What are "anchor babies"? What exact protests are you referring to? Maybe in future you could think about how people are going to read your question before you submit it? Then you will know if people can understand what you are asking.
2006-08-21 03:26:27 · answer #5 · answered by 420Linda 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
DE RAK WILL NOT BABY SIT. HE/SHE IS NOT MATURE ENOUGH.
2006-08-21 03:25:10 · answer #6 · answered by QUE PASA?? 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋