About every five minutes, just to be on the safe side.
No reason for them to get away with anything.
2006-08-20 20:04:50 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Family
Classic. Meowder.
2006-08-20 20:09:43 · update #1
I have to say that Beth gave a legitimate and quality answer.
2006-08-20 20:11:17 · update #2
Cat is in the running for ten points for sure right now.
I loved the observation that you can't talk to a child like an adult.
2006-08-20 20:15:06 · update #3
The problem is that the average parent whips a child to prove something or when out of control. He doesn't have the patience to bear with a child's disobedience.
It is his childlike inability to resist temptation. The whipping is not an act of cruelty, but rather an experience designed to counterweight the aspect of temptation in the future.
My father whipped me constantly when I was young, and even well into my teens. I would be 16, bent over a bed with a belt slapping my butt hard, because I had done something so "innocent" as just talk rudely to my mother.
My father also devoted himself to me entirely in recreation, attention, etc. etc. etc. He would have never gone fishing with buddies instead of playing with me.
He was rigorous, but patient, and devoted.
You should whip a child for all rebellion. Whipping is not what undermines them emotionally.
The problem is the whole spirit of impatience and violence displayed by many parents.
2006-08-20 20:26:01 · update #4
Whenever they deserve it. You can't treat a child like an adult and try to talk to them...know why? CAUSE THEY AREN'T ADULTS! I think spanking is great. I think the idea of ever making spanking a child illegal is retarded. However, don't beat your kid.
2006-08-20 20:13:29 · answer #1 · answered by Cat 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I remember when I used to get a whooping when i was little, yeah it made me stop do-in what i was at the time, but I don't think you should hit your child with anything to prove a point. However when a child is running through the house drawing on the walls and crazy things related to that then I thing then would be the necessary time.
2006-08-20 20:16:47 · answer #2 · answered by pac-man 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hope you are just being silly... I am a firm believer in child dicipline and a good swat on the butt with the palm is fine... but to whip a child is crossing a line... unless your child is the son of Satan, in which case, even if you whip him... he is sure to kill you later.
2006-08-20 20:11:09 · answer #3 · answered by Whatev' Yo' 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
what do you mean by whip? a couple of swats on the backside? or to really whip him as with a belt? a couple of swats on the backside will not hirt him, but make him stop and think. the whipping NEVER good luck grams
2006-08-20 20:16:25 · answer #4 · answered by grams 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I dont believe in violence towards children. In the long run it messes with theyre emotional health. There are other ways to show them that they have wronged. So my answer is never.
2006-08-20 20:16:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
U SHOULD NEVER WHIP A CHILD. its so inhuman u should find some other sort of punishment like taking away there ipod or TV preliges for a week or so
2006-08-20 20:11:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Maybe someone should viciously whip you instead with that attitude.
2006-08-20 20:11:34 · answer #7 · answered by SomeoneUdunno 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Unless they have done something terribly bad, DON'T DARE!!!
2006-08-20 20:11:00 · answer #8 · answered by Professor Chris 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
when they are small & run away from you at a crosswalk or get lost at a store.
2006-08-20 20:15:17 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
you really should'nt if you talk to them in a manner they understand.
2006-08-20 20:11:51 · answer #10 · answered by blackpapichulo40 1 · 4⤊ 0⤋