Cure For Aids..Government Conspiracy..?

Question

i have heard many rumors that this mayb a goverment conspiracy to keep the cure a secret or limited to somewhat important people..if any1 thinks thats true ,what would b the advantages for the goverment ..y not just release the cure..is this possible..? any thoughts or opinions..

Answer 1

They are just rumors. There are plenty of nerve agents and other biologicals, such as anthrax or small pox that would work just fine.

The HIV virus was immediately recognized as a nutated animal to human virus. That is why everyone is so fearful of the avian flu virus, because it shows the same ability to mutate quickly to avoid detection for the creation of a successful vaccine and to fool the human immune system.

Answer 2

I think most of you are paranoid about your government. What sense does it make to create a virus that just about anyone can get for which there is no cure? Opressive governments might do this but there would have to be a cure before it's released or everyone within the government may come down with it. If governments want their people to die, they can simply start a war with their neighboring government. It's quick, easy and no government member is involved. Or, like current affairs, have one state sponsor another's country's insurrection. People die and government has clean hands. That's much easier than releasing a virus that will get everyone, everywhere.

That's just like nuclear war... One bomb and lots of fallout. Where will the fallout go? Everywhere. Nobody is safe. And, will one bomb be used in a nuclear war? Hell NO. So where's all the nuclear fallout going? Everywhere. Worldwide. Every nation and everyone gets some. Nobody wins.

Biological warfare is the same. Without a cure somewhere, nobody wins. HIV and AIDS is not biological warfare it's unsafe sex. It's not govenment conspiracy, it's personal choice and lifestyle.

Answer 3

The government of the United States would rather spend the money for the cure than spend the money for the lifetime of medication for a person with AIDS. It takes enormous amounts of money to exact a cure for any disease. Why not diabetes? Or multiple sclerosis? The are people working on cures for all sorts of diseases. It takes time to do the testing and it takes money to have the resources to do the testing. The drug companies are working towards a cure. If there was currently a cure there would be too much money made to withhold it. I don't believe for a minute it's a United States government conspiracy. But in answer to your question, the only government that would do this would be the government that routinely kills it's people anyway, such as in any African country. They do withhold vital medications from their population. In addition to food, housing and other amenities we here in the US are spoiled with.
The only advantage these dictators have gained are power and money for themselves and their families.

Answer 4

Ploobis is correct. According to Dr. Leonard Horowitz' book about Ebola and Aids, the new emerging viruses; and a site I read years ago on the web by two doctors in (if I remember correctly)-Texas, the Department of Biological Germ Warfare was approached by the Department of Defense to create a virus. The government was asked for $10 million dollars for creating this virus. When asked how long it would take the DBGW to create such a virus, the reply was "about 5 years." This was in 1969. By 1975, the AIDS virus was created.

Like I said, this information is available on the Internet. The book is amazing and names people with "very long arms" who were involved in the creation of this disease. The World Health Organization was also involved.

You really should read the book. It's called "Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola." Here is a link to Dr. Horowitz' website which includes his credentials, etc. http://www.drlenhorowitz.com/

Eye opening, to say the least.

Answer 5

I also believe there is a cure for cancer, but the government has the patent, this way they control the population. Think about it, if they had a cure for cancer, HIV, ALS, look at all the money the professions would lose, from drs to pathologists, to nurses, nursing homes, medical facilities, not to nemtion the makers of drugs. Watch the movies Break Out, it will make you wonder

Answer 6

No. Having labored at 2 pharmaceutical companies in R&D and witnessing how freaking complicated it somewhat is to explain how maximum cancers works, the thank you to attack it, and the thank you to attack it selectively, i do no longer think of all and sundry is sitting on a scientific care. there are multiple good hearted people in the attempt to discover treatments for many cancers (i might say maximum individuals in this form of learn at great pharma companies somewhat extremely % to discover a scientific care) and if some pharmaceutical bigwig desperate to take a seat an a scientific care, people might leak it. they had bypass away the enterprise and improve yet another scientific care, or some thing like that. people will continuously get maximum cancers, there'll continuously be a industry for a scientific care. And the longer people stay, the greater in all probability they'll % drugs for different ailments, or perhaps different cancers. i do no longer think of there is even a good financial argument for this way of conspiracy perception.

Answer 7

I believe the cure is here its given from a natural substance like a plant and I believe the government hides alot..population control..who says they didnt invent aids....

Answer 8

I heard they have it but, the world is over populated so they need at least 30% to die.
I was listening to some teenagers talk this is there answer.
I honestly wonder remember kids do say the darnest things.

Answer 9

There are natural anti-virals/bacterials out there that are very potent, check out olive leaf extract, grapefruit seed extract, and colloidal silver. These are but a few natural treatments I have used over the years on me and my kids. I stumbled on them by accident and then really started checking them out and using them. Also for cancer check out a product called essiac.

Answer 10

I agree. The government's advantages? Population control in poverty-stricken areas, ultimately, without considering it would run rampant in our developed country. Also, why would Shaq have HIV for so many years but never AIDS? Money!! He can afford the thousands of dollars it costs for drugs to help immunosupressant people, but others can't.