English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

You can't see an atom but we know it's there. It's the same with God. Even with the strongest microscope an atom is invisable. The atom has tiny things orbiting around it and inside those things are other tinier things fliterring around. And they get smaller and smaller..This is called quantam physics.
All this just happened thru evolution, right? The origin of everything is too complicated to have "JUST HAPPENED"
What are your thoughts on this?

2006-08-20 08:49:26 · 20 answers · asked by Cal 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

20 answers

as a firm believer in God, I believe that it is the people who have been mislead to think otherwise that are confusing those who know there is something of a higher conciousness, thereby leading them to believe in evolution and all of it's so-called facts about where we came from. God will show everyone Himself in due time...meanwhile He does not need to be questioned..

2006-08-20 08:55:49 · answer #1 · answered by aldamixxmasta 3 · 0 2

Yes, with the proper instruments you CAN see an atom, or at least get evidence of its existence. Where's a proper instrument to see God, or to have evidence of his existence? And don't give me "Who else could have made the world?" or things like that. I need something that proves beyond a doubt that life WAS God's creation. Your rhetorical question only proves we may still not have answered all the questions on this subject. Not that the missing answer is "God did it". So, don't prove we don't have answers. Prove the answer we miss is unequivocally God.

It is very annoying when you believers try to misuse scientific methods to "prove" God's existence. I mean, you may believe if you want. But if you want to "prove" to us that your belief is in something true, you need to follow strict scientific procedures. Your reasoning here amounts to saying that 2+2=4 because 2+2 doesn't give any other known result. That's nowhere near a proof. It's a reasoning based on the fact that we don't know everything. Just because we didn't know (of course, we do) what 2+2 is, that wouldn't be proof that any given result is as good as the others. You have to go through strict methods to prove unequivocally that 2+2=4, and only 4.

2006-08-20 16:00:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The universe or whatever name you give it does not only get smaller, but also larger - - -without end. Without a beginning and without an ending. Coincidentally, just like it is said about God.

Until we have the tools to see further objects or smaller objects, we tend to justify the belief of God, due to our ego not allowing the possibility that we are a very insignificant aspect in the true realm of things. We claim to be the top of the food chain, when in fact, we all feed earth with our own flesh and blood. How much more complicated would it be to explain where God came from? Always was and always will be? We do not have the answer. . .so believe what you will. God made everything to feed earth . . . sounds a bit
lame to me.

2006-08-20 16:12:11 · answer #3 · answered by zambranoray 3 · 0 1

If you trust that the atom is infintessimally small, you can also just as easily believe that God is infintesimally big, or small. Either serves the same purpose. I'll expound upon this with my favorite religion to science joke:

The day after scientists finally perfected cloning, they elected a scientist to go to God and tell Him we had surpassed Him, in that we too could now create life. God replies, that He isn't so sure, but in fairness proposes a contest to create life. The scientist agrees, but God stipulates that it be done the original way. The scientist thinks for a moment, then looks down and scoops up a handful of soil, to which God replies ' Oh, no. Get your own dirt.'

Science as humans see it will never likely be where God uses it.

2006-08-20 15:58:40 · answer #4 · answered by baghyrha 2 · 1 0

Atoms are invisible even to microscopes right? So saying God exists proves that God is really invisible but still exists. SOmething visible can still exist. Evolution is a brilliant idea but false claim from an intelligent man. It gives a false sense of security. THere are many flaws in that assumption. How did DNA come together and evolve? My point is that evolution creates more questions than answers. Our world is so simple and complex that the idea of no powerful God ceases to be rational in my fertile thinking. Organized religion is garbage however and that theory helped to prove the worthlessness of its creators.

2006-08-20 15:56:00 · answer #5 · answered by Stephanie D 3 · 0 1

I know you cannot see God and the wind and your spirit but atom I'm not sure. Except atom is an atomic energy and therefore you cannot see it either. It could be connected to evolution somewhere around the beginning of time and named by scholar
of this earth.

2006-08-20 16:15:56 · answer #6 · answered by JoJoBa 6 · 0 1

We are at the fulcrum of matter. We can not see the end of the universe and we cannot see to the depths of the atomic bond.
God put us here for a reason. To know that he is God.

2006-08-20 15:55:15 · answer #7 · answered by Bimpster 4 · 0 0

Honestly... you're using scientific arguments you don't seem to understand. First of all, we can see atoms. They are visible with certain types of microscopes, not to mention the many ways in which we can *detect* them. None of this has anything to do with evolution.

2006-08-20 16:07:12 · answer #8 · answered by ThePeter 4 · 2 1

God always was and always will be! I don't care what anyone says I know God is here with me and everyone because he is powerful enough to be everywhere! We cant see him yet but we will and when these people who claim he is not they will find out one day on judgment day and they will be sentenced to Hell, to all you who will never change and never believe all I can say is have fun in Hell!!!

2006-08-20 15:57:45 · answer #9 · answered by Yahoo 4 · 0 0

All of this is the creation of God and no evolution. For evolution is a theory made by man.

2006-08-20 15:55:50 · answer #10 · answered by Carol M 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers