Questioner, you are an imbecile, for the following reasons:
(1) The ratio was 300 to approximately 1000. The losing force lost no more than 10-15% killed or captured - hardly a smashing tactical victory, since the numerically superior force chose to broke contact. It was a great moral and strategic victory - not, however, the outstanding tactical ***-whipping you erroneously state it as being.
(2) No Muslim army afterwards fought successfully outnumbered and won on any campaign, even during insurgencies such as Algeria. Muslim armies have been repeatedly beaten on anything approximating equal footing, or even with gross numerical superiority - witness the Reconquista, or the wars against Israel. Indians have beaten Pakistanis, Israelis have beaten Arabs, the Spanish have beaten Moors, the Americans have beaten Iraqis and Afghans. I won't even mention the colonial era.
(3) The Battle of Badr is ONE single example where a lopsided force ratio resulted in the outcome you gloat over. Should you be challenged to name further battles with the same criteria, I hardly think you'd be able to name them. After all, the greatest military power Islam ever had was Ottoman Turkey. The greatest general ever fielded by a Muslim army was Saladin - a Kurd. While Arabs have produced great scholars and beautiful architecture, they produce military genius in short supply.
It is clear you cannot connect any of this to a rational "reasoning and understanding" that enables you to see where the weaknesses of the Muslim world are in military affairs, and how best they can be remedied. Instead, you prefer to just throw faith-based proclamations as a substitute to scholarship.
You, are a complete imbecile.
2006-08-21 05:27:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nat 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Although by known accounts the Battle of Badr may have prove to be an important victory for the forces of Muhammad. It was by now means an absolute wander of bravery and chivalry. Muhammad and his forces numbered between 305 – 350 attacked by surprise, an armed caravan headed for Mecca, for the purpose of ghazawat (an armed incursion for the purposes of conquest, plunder, or the capture of slaves). Muhammad was surprised when he met a much larger defense of 900 – 1000 in strength (note: no known account by any side Muslim or other place the numbers higher then 1000) .
The brilliance of Muhammad’s tactics and his well-disciplined man are what turned the skirmish. After all, there blood sucked hands, after the killing of so many innocents, should have held against a defensive force of 900.
The results of this battle where 14 killed in Muhammad’s camp and 50-70 killed and 43 – 70 captured from the command of Amr ibn Hisham. The major discrepancies between the casualty totals on each side suggests that the fighting was extremely brief and that most of the Mecca's were killed during the retreat.
As to your quote and opinion; I must incline to disagree. The reason the American campaigns are losing ground in Iraq is the media. If America had done in Iraq what they had done in Japan with General Douglas MacArthur, we wouldn’t be having this conversation. However in today’s world with CNN, BBC and all the rest of them tree lettered channels the USA is no longer free to act as it should. The very power that is in the American free democracy and speech is what will be its down full. The Islamic Jihads are using the essential power of the western world against them. And more ironically, they are using the very power that they wish to combatant for combat.
Lastly, let me worn you that you should not be so exited about Islamic victory, since if this extremist evil wins your love of posting freely on this very form will be greatly diminished if not all together eradicated!!!
So since I know that what you claim is an Islamic victory is possible let me tell you one thing before the mother f**king Muhammadist ******* take over; F**K YOU AND YOUR PEONY INSIGNIFICANT MUHAMMAD AND HIS GOD. May HE desecrate your souls when you arrive at his gates!
2006-08-20 16:37:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by elfsareus 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah Raghead,I've Been Seeing All This Great War Fighting Ability...LMAO ...Ya Ragheaded A$$es Been Kicked Every Time Ya Try To Get It Goin On Man,Get Real,Hows Your Present Day Math?Looks To Me Like the Ragheads Been Gettin All Blown Up..They Are So Stupid They Blow Them Selves Up...Thats A Sure Way To Win A Battle GEEZ LMAO LOL,You Are A Joke..
2006-08-20 14:51:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why does Israel has the strongest army on that peninsula and surrounded by Islamic states. We all know Islam is spreaded by force. For years, Israel had it's hand tied behind it's back. Do you really believe that if the U.S Military wanted to destroy every Arab country it could...? Of course they could. Mark my words, if U.S has to choose between U.S lives vs. Arab Lives on a large scale, say bye bye to the Arab Nations. Look at Iraq just as a slap on the hand.
2006-08-20 16:34:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only thing the Americans will connect to is defeat. Yes! The Americans will taste defeat in the near future. Stay tuned.
2006-08-21 01:14:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Aside from any military action between anyone, how can anyone kill people in the name of Jihad or Allah or the Quran? I cannot believe that God ever intended for anyone to kill anyone else in his name. I'm sure that many will be in for quite a surprise when they die and judgement is placed upon them for their actions.
The real reason for the violence has nothing to do with religion. Religion is used as a tool to justify the violence and destruction by ignorant, uneducated and unintelligent people. A violent people to say the least. A race of people that have little value for life itself.
As you so state with your focus on violence, you reinforce the low opinion that many have towards you and your kind....
2006-08-20 15:34:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Billy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In 1967 five Arab armies massed on Israel's border, ready to advance simultaneously and kill every jew in Palestine. Hundreds of thousands armed to the teeth against Israel's small army...what happened? Gee...hmmmm...I wonder. Well first the Israelis destroyed the entire Egyptian Air Force on the ground, then they attacked in 5 different directions and totally humiliated all those so called muslim warriors.
2006-08-20 17:10:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Johnny Guano 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
HOW TO DEFEAT YOUR MUSLIM OPPONENT.
Wait until prayer time. Approach from the West side of enemy. Sodomize with rifle, discharge. End of problem.
I have never heard of an effective muslim military force, I don't think they are civilized enough to maintain command and control.
2006-08-20 16:48:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Don 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not only is this irrelevant to the catagory, you don't even support the assertion with historical evidence.
Muslim propaganda is what it is.
Israel kicks your armies butts everytime they meet. We defeated your best... twice with fewer numbers both times.
Please study history more carefully before embarrassing yourself in this manner.
2006-08-20 14:48:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Archer Christifori 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Israel beat the hell out of every Arab nation on the Peninsula, and they have 1/10th the people.
2006-08-20 14:54:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Black Sabbath 6
·
2⤊
0⤋