The Mutiny of 1857
"Indian Mutiny, the name given to the uprising of a large section of the Bengal army in 1857, which developed into a widespread movement of the agrarian and military revolt against British rule" (Benton, 111). Many considered this India’s war for independence. It "created a legacy of racial hatred which permeated all aspects of the relationship between the ruler and the ruled. The rebels created great acts of brutality and were suppressed in equally brutal ways" (Marshall, 359).
"The total strength of the Indian army in 1857 was 238,000 of whom about 38,000 were Europeans. Of the total of the Bengal army, the main center of the mutiny, numbered 151,000, including 23,000 Europeans"(Benton, 111).
The British army contained certain weaknesses. "One was the lack of outlet for Indian talent, promotion even to the subordinate rank open to Indians being strictly by seniority. Another was a strong caste consciousness which the alien leadership could neither control or assuage" (Benton, 112).
The mutiny arose when Indian soldiers assumed the British were plotting to destroy the Muslim and Hindu religions. Inadvertently, the English issued animal fat grease to be used to smear on the paper cartridges, which had to be bitten by the soldier. Hindus consider the cow as a sacred animal and the Muslims consider the pig unclean. Vegetable fat was quickly issued instead, but the Indian soldiers had begun to no longer trust their British officers.
The Indians rebelled. Battles raged for nearly one and a half years before peace was declared. From that point until India gained independence, the English East India company was removed from power and the crown took direct control.
2006-08-20 06:40:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by babygirl4us 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Babygirl4us has it almost right but in reality the grease used on the cartridges was not have animal origin but the instigators of the mutiny spread it about that it was animal. The story changed depending on who they were talking to.
2006-08-21 18:39:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
French and Indian conflict (1654-1763) Indian adventurer Hyder Ali conquers Knara, Mysore India Hyder Ali usurps throne of Mysore, India Chaos in India; Robert Clive leaves the country Clive defends interior the Commons his administration in India Warren Hastings made Governor of Bengal British East India agency Regulating Act Pitt's India Act: East India agency less than authorities administration conflict between East India agency and Holkar of Indore Indian commerce monopoly East India agency abolished British governor of India announces conflict on Gurkhas Sutte, Indian custom of immolating a widow on her husband's lack of existence, abolished in British India British troops conquer Sindh area in India Britain annexes Punjab
2016-11-05 05:56:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Encyclopædia Britannica Article
Indian Mutiny
also called Sepoy Mutiny, (1857–58), widespread but unsuccessful rebellion against British rule in India begun by Indian troops (sepoys) in the service of the British East India Company. It began in Meerut and then spread to Delhi, Agra, Cawnpore, and Lucknow.
Link for the free trial item in the article
To regard the rebellion merely as a sepoy mutiny is to underestimate the increasing pace of Westernization after the establishment of British paramountcy in India in 1818. Hindu society was being affected by the introduction of Western ideas. Missionaries were challenging the religious beliefs of the Hindus. The humanitarian movement led to reforms that went deeper than the political superstructure. Lord Dalhousie had made efforts for the emancipation of women and had introduced a bill to remove all legal obstacles to the remarriage of Hindu widows. Converts to Christianity were to share with their Hindu brethren in the property of the family estate. There was a widespread belief that the British aimed at breaking down the caste system. The introduction of western methods of education was a direct challenge to orthodoxy, both Hindu and Muslim. To these problems may be added the growing discontent of the noble Brahmans, many of whom had been dispossessed of their revenues or had lost lucrative positions. Everywhere the old Indian aristocracy was being replaced by British officials.
The mutiny broke out in the Bengal army because it was only in the military sphere that Indians were organized. The pretext for revolt was the introduction of the new Enfield rifle; to load it the sepoys had to bite off the ends of lubricated cartridges. There appears to be some foundation for the sepoys' belief that the grease used to lubricate the cartridges was a mixture of pigs' and cows' lard; thus, to have oral contact with it was an insult to both Muslims and Hindus. Late in April 1857, sepoy troopers at Meerut refused the cartridges; as punishment, they were given long prison terms, fettered, and put in jail. This punishment incensed their comrades, who rose on May 10, shot their British officers, and marched to Delhi, where there were no European troops. There the local sepoy garrison joined the Meerut men, and by nightfall the aged pensionary Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah II had been nominally restored to power by a tumultuous soldiery.
The seizure of Delhi provided a focus and set the pattern for the whole mutiny, which then spread throughout northern India. With the exception of the Mughal emperor and his sons and Nana Sahib, the adopted son of the deposed Maratha peshwa, none of the important Indian princes joined the mutineers.
From the time of the mutineers' seizure of Delhi, the British operations to suppress the mutiny were divided into three parts. First came the desperate struggles at Delhi, Cawnpore, and Lucknow during the summer; then the operations around Lucknow in the winter of 1857–58 directed by Sir Colin Campbell; and finally the “mopping up” campaigns of Sir Hugh Rose in early 1858. Peace was officially declared on July 8, 1858.
A grim feature of the mutiny was the ferocity that accompanied it. The mutineers commonly shot their British officers on rising and were responsible for massacres at Delhi, Cawnpore, and elsewhere. The murder of women and children enraged the British, but in fact some British officers began to take severe measures before they knew that any such murders had occurred. In the end the reprisals far outweighed the original excesses. Hundreds of sepoys were shot from cannons in a frenzy of British vengeance (though some British officers did protest the bloodshed).
The immediate result of the mutiny was a general housecleaning of the Indian administration. The East India Company was abolished in favour of the direct rule of India by the British government. In concrete terms this did not mean much, but it introduced a more personal note into the government and removed the unimaginative commercialism that had lingered in the Court of Directors. The financial crisis caused by the mutiny led to a reorganization of the Indian administration's finances on a modern basis. The Indian army was also extensively reorganized.
Another significant result of the mutiny was the beginning of the policy of consultation with Indians. The Legislative Council of 1853 had contained only Europeans and had behaved arrogantly as if it had been a full-fledged parliament. It was widely felt that lack of communication with Indian opinion had helped to precipitate the crisis. Accordingly, the new council of 1861 was given an Indian-nominated element. The educational and public works programs, roads, railways, telegraphs, and irrigation continued with little interruption; in fact some were stimulated by the thought of their value for the transport of troops in a crisis. But insensitive, British-imposed social measures that affected Hindu society came to an abrupt end.
Finally, there was the effect of the mutiny on the people of India themselves. Traditional society had made its protest against the incoming alien influences, and it had failed; the princes and other natural leaders had either held aloof from the mutiny or had proved for the most part incompetent. From this time all serious hope of a revival of the past or an exclusion of the West diminished. The traditional structure of Indian society began to break down and was eventually superseded by a westernized class system, from which emerged a strong middle class with a heightened sense of Indian nationalism.
2006-08-23 18:37:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by PK LAMBA 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
check the link below
2006-08-21 02:51:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by liam 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
it wasn't a mutiny.
It was the first war of independence.
2006-08-20 06:36:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by akg 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_rebellion_of_1857
2006-08-20 06:47:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by ☼ Magnus ☼ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
go n c da movie MANGAL PANDEY
2006-08-21 02:06:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋