Should the government do away with FED and state taxes and impose a fixed tax across the board.?

Question

As many people that don't pay taxes, I think it would benefit the economy because if you have a higher fixed tax on goods then everyone would have to pay. This would let us retrieve money from all the people dodging taxes, paying under the table, and illegals working in the country. Let's face everyone has to eat and buy clothes. So, we would actually benefit because there would be no way out of paying taxes. Plus thought of making 50K a year and taking home 50k would promote more spending and boost our economy because our economy is driven by consumer spending. Just a thought!

Answer 1

First I should note, the federal government can't change state tax law. That said, repelling the current federal tax system and replacing it with just about anything would be an improvement. A national sales tax is as good as any system I've heard. My response the the 'regressive tax' argument is: the 'rich' spend more the 'poor' have. Therefore the will still pay more in taxes. They don't get more from the government in return.

Answer 2

Some people would argue that a fixed tax on goods and services wold be "regressive," which means it would affect the poor more harshly. However, under the Republicans, the U.S. income tax system -- which was designed to collect a higher percentage of tax from the wealthy -- is becoming more regressive with tax cuts at the high-income end of the scale.

Answer 3

A pure GST is unfair to the poor as the poor spend 99% if not higher of their income on foods and daily needs, where-as the rich may only spend 50% of their income on purchases.

Answer 4

Why can we desire both of them? If the authorities were constrained to its enumerated powers, it may be financed through land sales and a small tariff because it became in the course of the nineteenth century (in the course of the nineteenth century, the talk became between those who needed a low tariff for "sales in ordinary words" and those who needed a severe tariff to "seem after" marketplace from competition). the region with the "FairTax" concept is that it really is "sales-impartial," meaning it does not something to reduce the obscene volume of sales at present amassed through the federal authorities. some human beings would merchandise that we "desire" to maintain the three huge unconstitutional authorities classes that are bankrupting us. Social safe practices and Medicare are about to flow bankrupt in any case, probably in the subsequent decade (bear in mind, the authorities is overestimating destiny monetary improve because of their conception that the phantom "fix" is actual). the american Empire, with its countless overseas wars, and protection stress bases in almost each united states of america on earth, is not purely unaffordable, even with the undeniable fact that it also makes us a lot less danger-free. with out the overseas wars to incite terrorism, we may haven't any desire for the nationwide safe practices state. If the federal authorities were to examine the structure (that forgotten historic relic that all and dissimilar the politicians swear an oath to uphold even as they take workplace in a quaint, yet now meaningless, ritual), they'd also understand that there is not any justification for the conflict on drugs in that document. in the journey that they weren't delusional, they'd understand that the conflict on drugs is a failure and of mission to our freedom (i in my view do not care very a lot for the right of losers to interrupt their body and that i even question no matter if human beings could be taking a number of those prescribed drugs, yet is it extremely properly truthfully worth the money and the lost liberties for a Drug conflict we can not win?). If we ended the Drug conflict, that would also keep us the money we spent on taxes to help conserving a group of self-detrimental losers in penitentiary for his or her own good. what's it about conservatives that they continuously look to trust that morality could be enforced through authorities really than through social stress and ostracism? the talk over an earnings tax as hostile to a sales tax is a distraction to dodge us from addressing the actual situation of spending.