English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

comments please. there are more i can qoute if need be.


Sepher Or Israel 177b If Jew kills Christian commits no sin.

Zohar (II, 43a) Extermination of Christians necessary sacrifice.

Hilkkoth Akum (X, 1) Do not save Christians in danger of death.

Babha Kama (113a) Jew may lie and perjure to condemn a Christian.

Iore Dea (148, 12H) Hide hatred for Christians at celebrations.

Abhodah Zarah (35b) Not drink milk from cow milked by Christian.

2006-08-20 03:20:17 · 19 answers · asked by funamentalist 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

19 answers

Thou shalt not kill! I believe this is the first of the Ten Commandments that God gave to Mose! Mose was Jewish If I remember my bible!

2006-08-20 03:28:52 · answer #1 · answered by John34 4 · 1 1

Well, you have a few completely bad quotes and a few out of context.

For example, religious Jews very often will only drink milk from a farm owned by Jews because in teh olden days, cows milk was supplemented by other animal milk when the buyers and owners were not Jewish. So a Jew, in order to ensure keeping the dietary laws would not buy from a non Jew so he could be certain he was getting only cow's milk. Nowaday, in the US (because of the government FDA laws) not all Jews follow this.

Jews also were supposed to hide hatred (though the Hebrew does not read "hatred") because it usually led to pogroms and slaughter of Jews.

The baba Kamma 113 actually only refers to members of the tribe of kena'an which no longer exists, but the tribe was known to be extortionists 2000 years ago. That is not current law.

The hilchot akum has to do with a situation where there is some doubt as to whether anyone is trapped in a building. If there is doubt and the person trapped is non Jewish, one may not break the sabbath just to find out if anyone is trapped.

The zohar quote (which is not even useful to your argument because the entire mode of discourse int eh zohar is not something which dictates law or performance/behavior) discusses a specific type of idolater who worships many idols and sacrifices children to those idols. Removal of such blasphemy is considered a good thing. I guess you like child sacrifice.

The sepher or israel one is my favorite. Some russian archbishop in 1892 quotes a supposed kabbalistic text and everyone takes his word for it. Meanwhile, no Jew i've ever met has ever heard of this book. Thus, even if it exists, it does not represent any jewish learning.

You might want to try learning instead of cutting and pasting...

2006-08-20 03:35:28 · answer #2 · answered by rosends 7 · 2 0

I don't have the sources before me at this time to see how accurate your quotes are but for some of them it is really a "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?" story. Meaning, were these things said because the Christians did somethings? Yes. If you need some verification for Christian crulty to Jews try the Pope, and previous ones actually were typically a large cause of the suffering. For example, the blood libels were completely rediculous. Jews don't eat blood. Yet many Jews were killed on such false claims. So say the milk quote is true, why not? Why should we trust that those who try to kill us didn't mix up other milk we can't drink on purpose, or even by accident? If you don't know that it matters, who says you would be careful and just serve milk, cow or camel, who cares if you don't keep it?

2006-08-20 07:07:44 · answer #3 · answered by Scane 3 · 0 0

When the Roman historian Tacitus pointed out 19 centuries ago that the Jews are unique among the races of man in their intense hatred and contempt for all races but their own, he was only repeating what many other scholars had discovered before him. For the next 1,900 years other investigators came to similar conclusions, either from a study of the Jews' religious writings or from a study of the Jews' behavior toward non-Jews.

Notable among these was the Great Reformer, Martin Luther, who in 1543 wrote in Von den JØden und Ihren LØgen :

Does not their Talmud say, and do not their rabbis write, that it is no sin to kill if a Jew kills a heathen, but it is a sin if he kills a brother in Israel? It is no sin if he does not keep his oath to a heathen. Therefore, to steal and rob, as they do with their usury, from a heathen is a divine service. For they hold that they cannot be too hard on us nor sin against us, because they are of the noble blood and circumcised saints; we, however, are cursed goyim. And they are the masters of the world, and we are their servants, yea, their cattle....

Should someone think that I am saying too much, I am not saying too much, but much too little. For I see in their writings how they curse us goyim and wish us all evil in their schools and their prayers.

The Jews responded to Luther like they responded to all the others. They put him down as just another "hater," blinded by religious bigotry. And today that's still the Jews' standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about them except the most fawning praise.

2006-08-20 03:39:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What rock did you crawl out fromunder? Do you really believe this.... its not about Jew vs. Christaian, the fact that you condone a human being killing another human being based on religiouse prefrance. Very very sad.

I have a quote for ya, "Thou shalt not kill". 10 Commandments

And if thats not good enough for you than nothing will be, and that is something you'll have to deal with when you get your 1 on 1 with your God.

Very, Very Sad.

2006-08-20 03:29:51 · answer #5 · answered by Krazee about my pets! 4 · 0 0

Is this turning into a political site and/or war zone? aand Why aren't the Hez ever mentioned as they show the US going down b4 Israel and have 7 strategic sites with insiders here in the US ready to hit. Who's more likely to kill US, really.

2006-08-20 03:59:25 · answer #6 · answered by spareo1 4 · 0 0

Your question is most laughable, seeing that the Jews are the most peaceful people on Earth, and you don't see them going around cutting off people's heads, murdering and torturing people and hanging them from bridges, like the animals around them.

They were too weak in the past, which is why they were murdered, so now that they're not going into the ovens anymore, they're accused of being killers.

They're like the types of creatures who only attack when attack - they just want to mind their own business and raise their families.

2006-08-20 03:30:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The Jewish, as well as the Christians, believe in the 10 Commandments. One of those commandments is, "Thou shalt not kill," and that is in the Bible's Old Testament.

2006-08-20 03:30:32 · answer #8 · answered by Holiday Magic 7 · 0 0

As Jesus became into striking on that bypass in destructive discomfort and taking his very final breath, his Father became into finding down on his Son and he became into telling his son that each and one and all human sins at the instant are forgiven. All sins, previous, present, and destiny. That because of the fact of his sacrifice the father became into affirming every physique no longer responsible of sin. And as stated above, the Son of God certainly spoke back to his Father. Jesus spoke the three words that are probably the main extreme 3 words ever spoken in all of human historic previous. that's what Jesus meant by skill of the very final words that he spoke. And those words have been recorded by skill of the apostle John who became into status on the very foot of the bypass that Jesus became into striking on. And returned those 3 words that Jesus uttered as he took his very final breath. John 19:30, "it somewhat is finished", and bowing his head he further up his spirit. God's plan for guy's eternal salvation became into over, and it became into an entire fulfillment. does God punish Christians (punitively) for his or her sins? confident, it somewhat is named discipline whilst the choose for face the organic (no longer criminal) effects of their sin. God will make one responsive to the offense and the certainty that the discipline is from him. If this weren't the case, what good might the discipline do? God would not take sin gently. He would not % us to take it gently the two. God won't enable his newborn get away with repeated sin. The discipline proves that individual extremely is God's newborn. God's discipline yields replaced habit. God's purpose in disciplining us is that we are going to proportion in his holiness.

2016-10-02 07:55:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

your quotes are all taken out of context or are wrong or are not the accepted answer in Judaism. What happend to the Christian idea of being open and loving and respectful?

2006-08-20 03:26:55 · answer #10 · answered by Naomi 3 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers