With SO many horrible crimes going down these days...who feels we should just take those found guilty to the middle of town and just let the families of the dead or abused get first crack at these sickos--
2006-08-20 02:43:07 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
If proved by DNA and no doubt by a jury then in 7 days:
Child Molesters - Death by firing squad
Rapist - Death by firing squad
1st Degree or Premeditated Murder - Death by firing squad
Child Pronography - Death by firing squad
Drug Trafficing and Distribution - Hanging
2006-08-20 02:52:45 · answer #1 · answered by Fitforlife 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I do not support torture of any kind. I would support public hanging. On the local Court House steps. Right after the trial and with a guilty decision by the Jury. Done deal. No appeal no jail house Country Club. No college, no work training, . No treatment for the "disease". No free food and free health care. Na-DA, DONE. A Child Molester or child killer that goes after a child should not be given any mercy as they gave the child no mercy. BTW, I would also support the Father or the Mother pulling the lever on the trap door.
BTW, public torture or humiliation is Bush's choice and was Hitlers choice, it is not the choice of the majority of Americans.
2006-08-20 03:31:47 · answer #2 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I may not agree with the public torture thing...but I like where you are going with this. I am sick to death of watching long, drawn out trials featuring sickos getting the limelight and taking it away from people who actually DO something positive for society..I thank the removal of parental power in the home primarily for the breakdown in morality. I do think if somebody commits a grievous crime, such as murder, rape, pedophilia..etc...and they have irrefutable proof..such as DNA...they shouldn't waste time after the trial to put their butt in a coffin. I think a good fix to this crap increasing in the future is getting rid of most of those behavior drugs they stick problem kids on and just BRING BACK THE PADDLE...it sure worked on me..lol
2006-08-20 04:43:12 · answer #3 · answered by jbbrant1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree with you, if they are found guilty. This would also include DNA testing to remove any doubt that the suspect is indeed the perpetrator of the crime. In punishing the condemned, I do believe that the family should have a voice in what punishment should be served to the guilty.
2006-08-20 06:02:06 · answer #4 · answered by Battlerattle06 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if proven guilty absolutely. To those who thinks it would hurt the justice system, I say its not working all that well now.
I saw that 6 countries still have stoning today.
2006-08-20 05:20:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES WE SHOULD! Justice is hardly ever served in this country anymore anyways. With all the looney judges in favor of all the child molesters, this country is getting alot worse. I agree with you 100%- Great question!
2006-08-20 05:15:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why not. It actually worked back then. Not to mention that the criminal population is treated better then your average person. I feel that if your a criminal you should have limited rights. I blame the P.C. (political correctness) bug that is floating around.
2006-08-20 02:51:01 · answer #7 · answered by zoerayne023 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The problem is with the criminal justice system. You have some people proven innocent after spending decades in prison. You assume the system works. It doesnt.
signed
been there felt that
2006-08-20 02:50:55 · answer #8 · answered by Mr. love 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A public execution or flogging would be a good thing, it would make you think before you go out and do the crime.
2006-08-20 02:52:51 · answer #9 · answered by duc602 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes you are right. i think Islamic concept of punishment is same. A punishment to one defaulter should be able to stop many others.
2006-08-20 05:15:04 · answer #10 · answered by Sindhie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋