Say you are near death. Your world ends. You're permitted to return to your own life on the conditions that you stick to the terms that would make you fufill your morals, integrity, health, and overall potential. You have to eat healthily all of the time, always be a person of morale, charitable, giving, etc. It perphaps wouldn't be as fun as one would like, but it'd be very fufilling. If you ever fluxuate, you'll be swiftly taken to your demise. Think of this situation as it if were real and tell me an honest answer of what you'd do with your options.
2006-08-19 23:52:51 · 14 answers · asked by Answerer 7 in Health ➔ Other - Health
Absolutly, I would, because I am always wishing I would stick to my morals, integrity, health, and overall potential. I try to remeber (as I eat a cupcake) that I could make better choices because I'm bringing death on. So, I'd be up for the challenge.
Great question. It really got me thinking about how I already know certain choices will take me to my demise, so why am I making them???
2006-08-27 10:49:50 · answer #1 · answered by justaquestioner 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think this is a no brainer. Most people try to live like that by choice. You have nothing to lose, do you ? perhaps you should have put some gruesome punishment into the mix...not just an early demise. Perhaps a slow, painful death or come back as Tom Cruises wife.
2006-08-27 20:50:30 · answer #2 · answered by dws2711 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
completely disagree with MBRCATZ. She's evaluating a certain, tax loose return on your money to a skill return on the inventory industry. A return of top rate coverage can return the equivalent of a 4-5% certain, tax-loose fee of return. particular, you could earn greater beneficial than that, even though it rather is not certain. Plus the version between a term coverage and a ROP term coverage is minimum. AND, it does not make experience for each individual, yet blanket statements like hers (i.e. "ripoff") are no longer helpful nor precise. Secondly, she's additionally overlooking the actuality that in case you have a 30 365 days return of top rate coverage and make certain in one year 29 which you do certainly choose to proceed coverage into your retirement which you will convert the coverage to a paid up coverage. So, in case you have been going to acquire $30,000 lower back in money, you may desire to in truth take a $60,000-$seventy 5,000 (ballpark) coverage into retirement without paying extra rates. Or, you may desire to take extra coverage into retirement and use the $30,000 (interior the occasion) to fund a clean coverage to diminish down the rates. in case you purchase term coverage you may desire to be sure that the coverage is convertible. AND, under no situation must you purchase 20 365 days term in case you like coverage for 30 years. that's a super mistake that human beings make. purchase coverage for the dimensions of time you like it. human beings do often want/choose coverage into retirement for rather some motives. One, is that maximum human beings are not often a hundred% arranged for retirement. stumble on a sturdy broking service/economic adviser that may be useful you. do no longer pass via a extensive on line business enterprise which will a) no longer keep you any money over the broking service/adviser and b) no longer have the skill to grant on the service that the smaller broking service/adviser can.
2016-09-29 11:33:30 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends. How old am I when I am near death? If I am old I would stay dead, but if not then I would consider going back. It's not as if I would be living any differently than I am living now. It would depend on your definition of morals, too. What kind of morals, exactly? Basic ones like the Golden Rule (that's easy enough to live by) or strict ones like no pre-marital sex (not so easy to live by)?
2006-08-20 06:20:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I would pass on that myself. I do not fear death or the afterlife nearly as much as I fear pain - physical, emotional, or psychological. There is too much negativity going on for me to want a "second chance".
Besides, I believe that we all have the choice of reincarnation as we travel though our spiritual lives.
2006-08-26 03:22:49 · answer #5 · answered by mgctouch 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure on the condition that it's going to be multiplied by the number of people I care about & hopes to spend my lifetime with them entwined.
How many lifetimes are you willing to offer so I can sign and close this deal with you?
seriously..?
2006-08-27 21:30:58 · answer #6 · answered by cascadingrainbows 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not all of us are sleeze bags and immoral. You just described my life...guess I would be given a second chance.
2006-08-26 20:28:36 · answer #7 · answered by sweetpea 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am already living by them...Would not return there is too much pain on this earth.
2006-08-25 08:38:24 · answer #8 · answered by mumtaz 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You'd be surprised. I live that way anyway, and know lots of other people who do also.
Of course, none of us is religious . . .
2006-08-27 09:57:23 · answer #9 · answered by nora22000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would definitely use the second chance at life.
2006-08-27 23:22:01 · answer #10 · answered by ScrawL 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋