Its not just Kofi Annan, its the entire UN system. It is one of the worst beuracracies in the world and it is near impossible to fire a UN worker. The UN never enforces its resolutions, and often they are too watered down to mean anything anyway. Ironically, Bush, who has been critizied for unilateral action, has tried far more than Clinton to involve the UN, but the organization won't act. Iraq violated countless resolutions, NK, Iran and Lebanon have all done the same, but the UN still won't enforce its own decisions. Kofi Annan has the power to reform it, but he hasn't done much.
2006-08-19 13:47:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by royalrunner400 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
What you should really be asking is isn't it way past time to get rid of the U.N.? Either that or find a leader in there who can really do something which is sooo tough with so many different countries and cultures involved.
2006-08-19 20:35:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by drokk 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Aw, HELL YEAH! That guy is as effective as a screen door on a submarine.
At least the US has John Bolton to get some backbone into the UN.
2006-08-19 21:02:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mom of One in Wisconsin 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes he is utterly ineffective.
He seems to let Israel and the USA do whatever they want.
2006-08-20 02:28:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by brainstorm 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-08-19 20:33:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anry 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Who are you to judge?
I suspect he does a damn side better job than what you could do!!!
2006-08-20 06:36:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by I_C_Y_U_R 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Long long way past time..
He has got to go...
2006-08-19 20:34:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Oh yeah! Isn't he and his son rich enough from what they've stolen?
2006-08-19 20:34:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
yes un sucks
2006-08-19 20:38:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by chet 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
He's a real moron
2006-08-19 21:06:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋