English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Millions of people who inhabit coastlines around the world will lose their lives if we continue ignoring this problem...and thats just the begening

2006-08-19 10:44:32 · 11 answers · asked by Deepthroat 1 in Politics & Government Civic Participation

11 answers

Greenland is the ice cube.

2006-08-19 11:00:58 · answer #1 · answered by Samurai Hoghead 7 · 1 0

Iceland got the name Iceland because when Hrafna-Flóki, the man who named it, saw a bay full of sea ice once he named it Iceland. Not because the land was full of ice. Iceland doesn't even have that much snow in the winter. I don't believe that the glaciers will melt totally, they have gotten smaller but that's just an era. Then it will get colder and they will grow again.

2006-08-20 16:57:21 · answer #2 · answered by Emina 5 · 1 0

Well no offence to the guy but Steven Hawking is an idiot. As a Harvard student I don't admire him, and I don't even care for him as his so called "facts" are nothing but junk.

By the way, Iceland is not ice... So it can't really melt...

Don't worry, mankind shall thrive!

2006-08-19 17:50:11 · answer #3 · answered by suppy_sup 3 · 1 0

Sorry, but Iceland cannot melt. It's not like just because it's called Iceland, it's made out of ice or something.

Please...

2006-08-19 17:50:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Really? How much of Iceland's land mass is going to melt, and just how will all of that soil and rock be turned into liquid?

2006-08-19 17:49:36 · answer #5 · answered by quietwalker 5 · 1 0

Just because Steve Hawking says so?

2006-08-20 01:57:05 · answer #6 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 0 0

Iceland and Greenland were named by the Norseman to confuse others, it obviously has worked.

2006-08-19 22:13:24 · answer #7 · answered by rikv77 3 · 1 1

Hmmm... Hawking usually sticks to cosmology and theoretic physics... Could you give a source to this claim?

2006-08-19 17:52:35 · answer #8 · answered by wiegraff13 3 · 0 0

Yeah, but what does he know.

He's only a brilliant Nobel-prize winning scientist with multiple graduate degrees. Why should we believe his calculations.

2006-08-19 18:44:29 · answer #9 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0 0

for those who do not have any offspring they dont care....it's those that keep producing are the one who damaged our environment!! These planet are no longer sustainable if we keep producing like virus!!

2006-08-19 18:34:31 · answer #10 · answered by sstooc2001 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers