OK, since people seem so keen on babies ... how about this? All those who are applying for green cards legally, skip over to the U.S. on a tourist visa, have the baby, rip up the application form ... right? Will do away for the necessity of any immigration law except for people above child bearing age and gays ...
Second, Al Quaida or Hesbollah or other merry men can start impregnating, let's say, 1000 women a month ... send them over here on tourist visas ... they have their babies ... next month, another 1000 come over ... all children of course being raised in "the faith" .. we have to unify the families, so in comes dad as well ... talk about home grown terrorists ... but hey, they're American citizens ... who is going to look after them if their parents are deported?? Is that what we want? Is that what the 14th was intended for? Because that's what the 14th allows as we speak ....
2006-08-19 09:24:39 · 17 answers · asked by Sashie 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
gobo .. hate and bigotry? Just pointing out what the 14th allows you to do ... simple really ....
2006-08-19 09:42:30 · update #1
lol Mendi ... 1000 men impregnate 1000 women ... think they can manage both that and terrorism, wouldn't you think? :)
2006-08-19 09:54:51 · update #2
Lets Get Real And Stop Lying To Ourselves
We Should STOP Being Politically Correct
About ALL Conditions
This One Is No Different
These Are NOT Babies
Not Even ANCHOR BABIES
Or CHILDREN Either
Lets Call Them What They Are
TOOLS
Tools USED To MANIPULATE The System Of Laws
Its Disgusting But Its The Truth
No PC About It
2006-08-19 09:42:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
Sashie, you have described the biggest constitutional CATCH22 in American history under the calamity of the times! Great food for thought.
(Freedom fighter was born again. lol)
2006-08-19 14:51:36 · answer #2 · answered by LaContessa 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Aren't the same people asking it? Just different faces? Looks that way to me. Babies should go home with the parents.
2006-08-19 09:56:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋
Wow, there would be no time for terrorism! They have to make a 1000 babies a month! Sounds like a horrible job, any guys up for the task? LOL.
2006-08-19 09:53:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋
Why would they rip up their application because they had a baby? Do you know how difficult it is to obtain a tourist visa? You need to become better informed.
2006-08-19 09:31:13 · answer #5 · answered by Carol R 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋
cuoldn't have said it better myself ms. sashie. mothers should be ashamed of themselves for harboring the idea of having a baby of our soil for purposes other than having a precious babie and one they could afford. Yep they are exactly what that gentlemen mentioned tools of the trade. parents and babies need to be shipped home togehter and this law needs to be ripped up. we can't take care of our precious childs who don't have mamas. these babies have mamas and need to be with them when they are deported.
Once again my cowboy and I agree.
2006-08-19 10:20:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
I second JD's answer
2006-08-19 15:12:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
OK, I say, if the parents, aren't legal, when they get here. Then their child, isnt LEGAL either.
2006-08-19 09:30:51 · answer #8 · answered by irishviper1 2 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Mexico would allow this to happen they would file a lawsuit to stop it.
2006-08-19 09:48:38 · answer #9 · answered by Zoe 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
that's one way to put it. I agree 100%
2006-08-19 09:31:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋