Morally wrong....bah. I think I can speak for most guys and say they can care less about morals. The problem comes in with it being Legally wrong, getting arrested and sent to prison to meet Bubba.
2006-08-19 07:02:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by null_the_living_darkness 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dude, I'm 19 and I' ve seen alot of pretty ladies, but as soon as I find out there under 18 everything changes. I wouldn't feel anything morally wrong about, but I would feel uncomfortable when it comes to sex, because if the relationship turns sour, she could say she was raped, now I know most girls would never say anything like that after a sour relationship, but I have had friends have their lives ruined from dating under age women, so most likely I would probably be her friend until she turns 18 then date her. All in all I know it sounds kind of crazy, but it just to protect my reputation.
2006-08-19 07:08:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by shogun 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If at 43 I found myself attracted to a 16 year old girl, I'd totally forget that situation in a heart beat. But if I were 18-25, things might be different, and I doubt I would have moral issues.
2006-08-19 07:04:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Life after 45 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
my bf will be turning 18 in 3 months, and i'm 15 now-he's 17 and will turn 16, 4 months after he's 18 so theres a 3 year difference to us and he loves me more than anything in this world. So i dont think it matters at all.... if the attraction is there n you both care about eachother.
2006-08-19 07:04:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bridgett 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Technically, the only statute that would desire to bar one in each and every of those ingredient from being criminal is M.G.L. c.272, sec. 4., which states that "Whoever induces all and sundry under 18 years of age of chaste existence to have unlawful sexual intercourse would be punished via imprisonment interior the state penitentiary for no greater beneficial than 3 years or in a penitentiary or abode of correction for no greater beneficial than 2 and one-0.5 years or via a good of no greater beneficial than $a million,000 or via the two such high quality and imprisonment." This has in basic terms been prosecuted as quickly as interior the state's history, because it demands that the criminal use coercion of a few style to cajole a "chaste" (or abstinent) minor to have sexual intercourse with yet another minor. In different words, as long because it rather is consensual and not a effect of coercion or an abuse of power, it rather is going to be criminal and not seen statutory rape as long as the two events are over sixteen.
2016-09-29 10:58:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
My wife was 14 when I met her and I was 24.
Elvis presley was 26 when he met 15 year old Priscilla
Bill Wyman of the Rolling Stones was 47 when he met a girl 13 and later married her.
Enough said
http://www.kcm.org
2006-08-19 08:04:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by aguyinthewoods 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'll be 18 in a couple of months but if i was 18 right now i wouldn't think it was wrong. as long as two people love each other than it doesn't matter how old they are.
2006-08-19 07:03:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well I like younger women, but 16 is not legal in most states, and I sure as hell dont want to go to jail, lol.
2006-08-19 07:03:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
nope when i was 18 i dated a 15yr old girl and the relationship was fine and so was the sex. then we had a sour ending and we still remain friends
2006-08-19 08:03:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by fletch514 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am wondering if they did find it morally right and find themselves in jail too.
2006-08-19 07:03:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by nastaany1 7
·
0⤊
0⤋