2006-08-19 05:05:11 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
yeah.i believe.bible is not complete & humen garbled it.in koran it is obvious.koran is the mosty completest book in the universe that nobody can write like that & nobody will.
2006-08-19 05:20:31 · answer #1 · answered by Ashton 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There has been some "garbling" but not intentionally.
For instance: The King James version of the Bible translated the following passage, written by James, "....and now there comes from God, a new righteousness that is not of the law...." There have been several Christian sects that believe this to mean that as long as you are righteuos then you have no need to obey the laws of man.
King James' translators did their best but could have translated that passage better. When read in the original Hebrew it reads, "...but now there comes from God, a new righteousness that is not of the TORAH...". The Torah is the first five books of the OId Testament and is still used by those of Rabbinical faith as the law by which they live.
Confirmation of this can be found in writings of the early Christians. In their zeal to spread the New Gospel James' words were translated into both Greek and Arabic. There is no transliteration of the words used in either of these languages and the closest English equivalent is "Holy Law".
Apostle James was telling us that the Old Testament had lapsed and we were now living under the New Testament.
2006-08-19 05:20:20 · answer #2 · answered by Albannach 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES!!!!! There is a definite history of this being done. Also the Judas Gospel was recently found, I read that in my National Geographic magazine, and there is a show called the Exodus (that's what my friend called it) that is suppose to air tomorrow on the History channel about Judas, and how he was not the 'bad' disciple, as we all thought, but turned Jesus in because Jesus told him to (to fulfill the prophecy). Many books and gospels were thrown out or alter because the priests didn't like them because it would interfer with what THEY wanted people to believe, and interfer with their control over the people
2006-08-19 05:19:33 · answer #3 · answered by arvecar 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No....I believ that men were inspired by God and wrote the books. If you don't believe in the Bible why don't you just move on and not talk about it and degrade it? I don't believ in the Koran but I somehow manage not to degrade it and talk about it all the time like it's some sort of discusting piece of fiction.
2006-08-19 05:13:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes. This makes complete sense when you consider that we have no original text. Without that original, how can we compare what we have now to what was originally written? Also, there are various versions out there in the present. I own a King James version. Compare that to one of the modern translations, and you'd be amazed at how different they are. Particularly the Psalms.
2006-08-19 05:16:43 · answer #5 · answered by gjstoryteller 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Blessed art thou young child. My books weren't garbled by men many years ago.
2006-08-19 05:14:23 · answer #6 · answered by whynotaskjesus 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely!
2006-08-19 05:21:56 · answer #7 · answered by connie_mspt 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, first recorded instance of this was the Nemian council
2006-08-19 05:11:22 · answer #8 · answered by corvuequis 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no
no people that put them together are findin evidence and trying to put it all together...there could be some of the stuff in there from many years ago
2006-08-19 05:11:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
no I be;leave they are still as acurate as when they were written and they have a message for all of us if we will only open our minds to them
2006-08-19 05:12:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋