When has Israel obeyed *any* thing coming out of the UN?
2006-08-19 05:30:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hezbollah attacked Israel hours after the cease-fire took effect.
Israel has broken the cease-fire since as well.
Neither side has completely stopped, so what's the point of a cease-fire?
It the totally off subject section:
I saw a news clip of Lebanese people getting paid for rebuilding their homes by Hezbollah (provided by the Iranian Govt, not Lebanon). $12,000 a person, in $100 bills, US Currency.
You would think they hate America, but for some reason still carry Bennies around to make payments... Why is that? I guess it would too blatant if they paid people off in Israeli Shekels so they use Dollars instead. If Iran is all that, why not use Iranian Rials? Must be because their money is worthless..
2006-08-19 11:51:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Michael 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
What nonesense! Hezbullah is already rearming with weapons shipped from Iran and Syria. That MUST BE STOPPED! Israel has to continue any and every pre-emptive strike to avoid more dangerous situation down the road. You should be more concerned by Hezbullah is not disarming, while the Lebanese people are under their partial control.
What short term memory you must have. So let me remind you that Israel has yet to get its kidnapped soldiers back. Why don't you mention that? Why don't you get angry about that?
BUT FOR Hezbullah going on Israeli soil, killing 8 and kidnapping 2 soliders, Israel would not have been on the offensive to destroy Hezbullah.
The UN resolution is a joke. It addresses nothing but a recommendation to have the soldiers released. Their condition and whereabouts are still unknown to the public. Israel must do and continue to do any mission that can improve the release of its soldiers.
I am outraged at your nonesense commentary. Outrageous!
2006-08-19 11:54:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by EDDie 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
It's too important to assassinate resistance leaders in their homes. If the goal was just to stop the transport of weapons across one bridge, and the intent was to abide by the terms of the cease fire, they could have shown photos or other proof this was happening, then asked for permission to blow up the bridge. Now Israel can say they signed a peace agreement and the Arabs (who cannot restrain or govern themselves) broke it by firing on them. It's likely irrelevant to Israel's ally that the IDF was conducting an offensive raid which Israel specifically agreed not to do.
2006-08-19 11:33:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Hezbolla refused to disarm and was caught in the act of rearming, therefore the cease fire is null & void and Israel has every right to pro-actively defend itself.
2006-08-19 11:39:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by My Evil Twin 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
these jews are terrorist!
we can't expect much of their word
see that no one (from world powers) will complain if israel broke the ceasefire
but when hezbollah arrested and executed infiltrating israeli soldier - these so-called world peacekeeper and democracy (USA) support israeli ruthless acton
what a 'fair' world
2006-08-19 11:40:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by arifin ceper 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
they didnt break the cease fire, hezbollah did, get your facts straight, besides, israel was cool about it and still kept their troops on stand down. so its still a cease fire over there, even though hezbollah's cheating
2006-08-19 11:34:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by penguinsupersoldier 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
They can't stop now, it's too engrained in there culture, historically the Jewish State (Zion) has been a ruthless warring nation, they kill in the name of their God (the god of war and chaos) and they will continue till the end of time.
2006-08-19 11:36:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
you are joking right? the Hezbos never disarmed!
2006-08-19 11:34:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bawney 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
not when they are provoked.
2006-08-19 12:23:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by ssgtusmc3013 6
·
0⤊
0⤋