I agree that it is useless. Teens will have sex and they must be taught ways to protect themselves from STD's and pregnancy. If parents would be realistic about their children's behavior and teach them about these issues at home, we wouldn't have nearly the numbers of teen pregnancies. But for whatever reason, some parents think that their children are different than they were...
2006-08-19 01:48:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, this dumb a$$ does believe in science, I just fail to believe we evolved from chimps okay. And no I do not think abstinance works for sex- ed, I think teaching responsibility and the proper use of birth control and how to use a condom works. I have 2 children and I am not leaving their sex education up to the school the way so many dumb a$$ parents do. I am teaching them about sex and love and responsibility at home, where it should be taught. If people would just be open and honest with their kids ,it would make it alot better.
2006-08-19 01:48:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by messijessi 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
A lot of the groups that teach abstinence only may have higher pregnancy rates, but lower sexual activity rates and fewer STD's. What needs to be taught is more responsible sex-ed. Instead of having a good portion of our younger generation using sex as a hand shake, it should be taught that it is ok to wait and to get to know some one first before getting physical. The rate of infection for STD's has been increasing lately because people think that just because the woman is on birth control they do not need to wrap.
2006-08-19 02:18:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by andy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't approach this in a childlish way, I don't insult your beliefs so don't insult mine. Secondly, for some it does help because it explains out that if you don't want to risk a pregnancy or getting diseases that abstinance is the only way to go about it. And as for not believing in science that is not true. Other scientific studies have also proven that comprehensive, talk about it all, sex-ed programs can increase the likelyhood of teen sexual activity because they walk out of those classes seeing that they have lots of not so effective options but all they heard because they are teenagers was that they had options so they try having sex.
The best way to go about it is to remove sex-ed from the school system and have parents teach what they believe is best for their child to learn. It is not up to a school district to decide what is right for every child to learn.
You might want to even take a look at this website. http://www.csun.edu/~psy453/sexed_n.htm
2006-08-19 01:56:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
In this day and age probably NOT. Teenagers are curious by nature and are going to have sex (generally speaking) there are a select few that are very confident about themselves and don't. I think, safe sex should definately be taught, as well as self-asteem. But you have too many "radical" parents that don't want a teacher educating their child about sex... because they claim it is their job, yet they don't do it either. There are scientific studies on thinks "dumber than us", I think it comes down to poorly educating children, All they are learning is how to file ridiculous lawsuits. It is on the same level as no prayer and saying the pledge in school. These people act as if their child is being PERSONALLY VIOLATED to hear positive words, and I don't understand it myself. I remember being in school and having prayer before lunch (public school!). Back then, if you didn't want to participate, be quiet for two minutes, and the "painful torture" would be over, it didn't end in a law suit.
2006-08-19 01:59:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by iceberg 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's a method that is guaranteed to work, so it's an important thing to teach. The problem is, all teenagers won't adhere to it, even the one's who take some sort of pledge. So It's a foolproof method that is not likely to be used. Great if you're not all that interested in actual results.
If it's results you DO want, though, you need to educate teens. They must understand how babies are made. They must understand exactly what causes VD's and how they spread. They must understand the concept of safe sex.
The problem is, many people want to restrict teen's behaviour by just giving them part of the picture. The result: teens are partly ignorant, and still have sex. They don't protect themselves though, so VD's spread and they get pregnant.
2006-08-19 02:02:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by ThePeter 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
you're thoroughly precise. scholars could understand there truth about sex. Abstinence in ordinary words sex ed has been shown now to not artwork. some human beings imagine that a do not ask- do not tell coverage is brilliant even with the undeniable fact that it really is purely placing childrens up for STDs and being pregnant. in point of fact, condoms are extra probably to artwork than not and that i have not met a unmarried individual who a condom failed. I advise to proceed to state the data because they're data. no you may do something to you for talking the truth. in the journey that your instructor begins bitching back, tell her that you've been purely affirming the truth and that you do not desire your friends to have the incorrect advice (which she is providing).
2016-11-30 19:45:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No I think that abstinance is taught with religion. I think that schools should teach the risk and negative points but also provide means for teens to protect themselves. They're going to either do it or not do it no matter what is said at school. The best bet is to offer to help protect.
2006-08-19 01:46:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Abstinance only sex-ed works every time that it is adhered to unlike condoms that break or that don't always get used or other forms of "sex-ed" that tell children that they can't exercise self control and that waiting until marriage to have sex is some outdated concept of little value in today's world were we have become wise in our own eyes and where many call that which is harmful "good".
Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! 21 Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!
2006-08-19 01:48:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Martin S 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
In theory, it is the only GUARANTEED way to not get pregnant.
If you get pregnant, you obviously did not pay attention in class.
I know your argument "They are gonna do it anyway" That may be true but then, my friend, deal with the consequences of your own actions. Teens like to say they are responsible and should be allowed to have their own choices. Life is all about choice. All choices have consequences. That is what they should be teaching. Kids today do not want to deal with the consequences of their own actions.
2006-08-19 01:50:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by damndirtyape212 5
·
1⤊
0⤋