Who do you think is tougher on illegal immigration, Republicans or Democrats? Illegal immigration increased under Clinton. However it was Reagan who signed the last general amnesty bill.
Also does anyone else agree that partisan bickering on a subject like this is useless and boring?
2006-08-19 00:04:34 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
I repeat, the earth is one country and mankind it's citizens. God didn't draw the lines, man did. Man can also erase them. Borders are unnatural. That's why the jobs and people to fill them don't balance out. Erase the borders and everything will fall into place, naturally.
Man drew the lines to have something to fight and kill over. This is children's cowboys and Indians play, my-side-of- the-room, your-side-of-the-room play. Isn't it time we grew up and put childish things a way?
Competition is obsolete, the spirit of the new age is cooperation. Catch up!
Totally agree--useless and borING!
2006-08-19 01:35:57 · answer #1 · answered by GypsyGr-ranny 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You have to look at the individual. There are Democrats, particularly in the South who are against illegal immigration. There is an entire class of Republican globalists (big business) that is totally in favor of cheap labor and free flow of everything, confident they will end up on the upper crust.
The rest of us Republicans still use the services we pay for, like public schools and health care for the elderly, and need them to be funded and servicable for our families. I think the parties need to be redesigned into a populist and an elitist party, since big labor is every bit as elitist, in a different way, than big business. It's capital is bodies, is the only difference. The individual protections and rights are not being protected by a particular party.
However, more Republicans in the House at least are anti illegal immigration than Democrats are.
2006-08-19 09:30:01 · answer #2 · answered by DAR 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't make any difference on what we think about this issue. Things are not going to be any different just because I think all the bickering is useless.
2006-08-19 07:38:43 · answer #3 · answered by jbpammy004 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's mutual...just depends on the circumstances, like in an election year and what is an issue or not at the moment.
2006-08-19 20:43:39 · answer #4 · answered by LaContessa 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it does not matter what I think, people will not listen to reason. There are always the nuts that make the sane in any organization look bad.
2006-08-19 07:12:27 · answer #5 · answered by livlafluv 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋