English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I know it goes against the second law of thermodynamics, but are there foods that actually have a higher caloric count after they're cooked? I get paranoid when measuring out pasta or oats or whatever, before they're cooked--not knowing if they'll increase in calories after I cook them. If I know the calorie count after cooked, I go by that, but the info isn't always at hand.

I ask because I sometimes come across some foods on a calorie counter webside that actually have higher caloric coutns after prepared. I know this has to do with changes in volume after cooked, but I just want to know if there is any other reason for it.
Thanks.

2006-08-18 22:38:34 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health Diet & Fitness

4 answers

Usually things are added (like fat) to prepare food. For example, I was using the Mypyramid.gov site and they stated that egg beaters were 300 calories when on the box it said 30 calories per serving. I emailed them thinking it was an error but they said that it's 300 calories after cooking because calories from butter were added. It can be pretty deceptive because I dont use butter!

2006-08-19 01:27:40 · answer #1 · answered by KathyS 7 · 0 0

Does a calorie counter count calories from oil? When cook quite often oil is added. Especially pasta.

2006-08-18 22:51:21 · answer #2 · answered by Kanda 5 · 0 0

the only thing i know is that nutrients are lost in foods depending on how you cook it

2006-08-18 22:44:43 · answer #3 · answered by beautyqween19 1 · 0 0

first of all if your conserned about calories pastsa is junk food and as long as you dont add,salt,sugur i dont think it increases in calories

2006-08-18 22:42:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers