English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bush said Iraq war would be over in 8 months ( Nov 03 ) and they (Iraqi people ) would have open arms and open hearts for the USA Military. Man!! did Bush tell a lie? Iraq is now a mess and the USA is getting a rear end beating.

2006-08-18 17:47:10 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

13 answers

liberal, always looking for a way to down the president. you guys are the people lying, always twisting things to make him look bad , and yourselves better. stop the crap. enough already. stop your crying or go change your panties.

2006-08-19 00:12:46 · answer #1 · answered by ssgtusmc3013 6 · 1 0

when you're ill of maximum folk opinion on Bush at present you could continuously pay interest to Limbaugh or Coulter... If that would not interest you there is proffesional activities, video games , pornography, romance novels, flow-sewing golf equipment, pokemon or beanie toddlers. So, you spot you've many selections to listening to how Bush lied. (also, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, Scott Mekllelan, Andrew Card, Judith Meirs, Alberto Gonzoles and Donald Rumsfeld-they lied too).

2016-11-30 19:27:57 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

why people don't like to admit facts ?
yes....Bush lied about the war in Iraq,he lied :
1- About the cause of it - when he declared that there are weapons of mass destruction
and it was a "FIASCO" - !!!
2- The duration of the war.
Saddam is captured,the Iraqi Govt. has been changed,what the hell our boys still doing there ? Their remaining means one of those following 2 points :
A - we are "LOOSING" the war,or in other words,we can not hold control and order in Iraq.
(and in my opinion we never will) !!!
B - or the boys are kept there to protect the U.S Oil Investments !!!

I believe the longer our boys stay in Iraq,the worst it will be for them,because it will take much more than what they are equipped with to last longer over there.

2006-08-18 20:24:35 · answer #3 · answered by Fadi 2 · 0 1

Bush didn't lie. He was mislead. Look at Ahmed Chalubi and the INC. They were the main source of information that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, et al..., listened to. It's been known since the mid to late 90's that they weren't reliable. That's why Clinton didn't act against Iraq. Since our invasion of Iraq, we've cut all ties to them and have in fact raided their offices several times. They've been accussed of forgery, money-laundering, and supporting the insurgency. Chalubi has aligned himself with groups that are pro-iranian.

2006-08-18 18:47:35 · answer #4 · answered by darkemoregan 4 · 1 0

He did not lie, I believe he truly believed it would be over as quickly as he said. The way that the troops were sent over and the equipment they had shows that Bush did not believe that Iraq would develop into the problem it has.

2006-08-18 17:55:02 · answer #5 · answered by kevin r 3 · 1 1

Here is a better question why did they take their focus of osama and afghanistan then go after iraq. answer to it is we werent doing to great in afghanistan and we couldnt find osama for way too long and people started having worries about safety and about if we would ever find osama so he attacked iraq to win the mid term election in 2002 and to be reelected for a second term.

2006-08-18 18:07:01 · answer #6 · answered by buypepsinotcoke 2 · 2 0

Why did Clinton lie?
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman"
"Oral sex is not sex"

Who said we are losing in Iraq?
Don't forget, Congress authorized deployment of troops. And they continue to fund the operations.

2006-08-18 17:59:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

LISTEN once in a while and get a clue. Bush clearly has stated, over and over again, that the war on terror would be a long and hard struggle, but we must remain resolute and we must win. No gray area there, eh?

2006-08-18 17:56:02 · answer #8 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1 1

america are gettin a good old whooping at the hands of the arabs....it wont be long before the war comes to american soil....iran could do it....north korea could do it....maybe russia and china together

2006-08-18 22:02:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

HE IS TRYING 2 SOLVE ALL OF THE PROBLEMS IN THE MIDDLE EAST BY HIMSELF











EVEN IF INNOCENT SOLDIERS HAVE 2 DIE 4 IT












HE THINKS HE CAN RULE THE WORLD














WHAT A DUMBAZZ

2006-08-18 18:01:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers