The only thing that makes me tingle more than a smart woman is a creative woman. Put a paintbrush (or better yet, a brazing torch) in her hand and I'm hers to command.
But to your original question -- I discovered a long time ago that the sexiest part of a woman's body was the part between her ears. If only because the conversation is so much better while you're lying there waiting to catch your breath for the next time...
2006-08-18 16:41:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Scott F 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Give me a smart, deep woman any day. I think I'd get bored or frustrated with a sweet but intellectually plodding girl; I prefer the stimulation of bouncing ideas off someone who can bounce them back. To me, someone who likes to read a lot of books, listen to NPR, solve puzzles, and think about how the world REALLY works is an exciting prospect for a partner.
2006-08-18 15:51:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Blenderhead 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think I prefer an intellectual equal, to put it in your terms. I don't think you can rate people, but well, I prefer smart ladies than dumb ones.
I don't want to impress a lady by being better than her, or feeling 'better'. I want to be a couple of two equals.
There are several layers of inteligence, for somethings, I'm smarter than you, for some you're smarter than me, and for some we're both pretty dumb.
2006-08-18 15:10:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Roberto 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I prefer an intellectual equal.
However, my preference for women depends more on how we get along when we're together. Chemistry cannot be determined solely by intellectual compatibility.
2006-08-18 15:07:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tuna-San 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
same reason women human beings do. And have self assurance it or no longer it does artwork each now and then(I had warm girlfriends formerly i grow to be warm). i visit provide you that some men are shallow and bypass after looks even as looking ahead to human beings now to not care about their personal. yet being lifelike, looks will fade and in the adventure that they are all that ever mattered then your type will hit the point the position they could discover no one because they are going to have an interest in a slew of human beings who desire no longer something to do with them. i'm no longer saying that you'll die on my own. i'm saying that in case you do not replace your options-set then by technique of the time you already recognize your mistake, you heavily isn't able to suited it. you'll finally end up lonely and former and the in uncomplicated words human beings you'll opt to be with will turn in disgust because they're only as shallow as you. Karma might want to correctly be ironic ya recognize :) Dictated yet no longer examine, Vincent
2016-11-26 00:57:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Intellectual equal.
2006-08-18 15:04:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Albannach 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I just want a woman that I like to look at and be intimate with and that I have things in common with and enjoys some of the same activities I do - nothing more
2006-08-18 15:05:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Big Buddy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think most people who think they're intelligent are also very egotistical. . .and that's a major turnoff.
But then again, how much choice do any of us have in who we fall in love with?
2006-08-18 15:02:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by ThatGuy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ill take intelligence.
2006-08-18 15:06:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
An intellectual equal, please. Romance and sex only go so far. It's nice to have someone who can contribute to, or initiate, good conversation.
2006-08-18 15:09:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋