English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

31 answers

Our bodies show the evolutionary path, our spirit is something else. It's like yeast, in bread. Or a sead, in soil. These are not scientific statements, more like poetry, for those who have ears for such...

2006-08-18 19:15:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Bone structure similarities do not prove anything.
If we evolved from apes, or monkeys, then humans would still be evolving over time.
But, no humans are coming from the wombs of prime-apes.

We reproduce from Man to Woman mating.
I'd much easier believe in the big bang theory then evolving from monkeys.
Make no mistake, i believe we were created by The Lord.

Darwin was of course, and intelligent person, and i can see where he got his ideas from.
But for those that are claiming he started and atheist religion, i feel i must point out, Darwin was a Christian, but he believed The Lord set it up so that science could work out along to create life.


If we evolved from monkeys, we'd still be evolving, but if you look closely you'll realise that as time goes by, more and more people are born with birth-defections, only proving that we are if anything, de-evolving.

2006-08-18 20:30:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Substituting the be conscious ape for monkey, what you assert sounds like the very unpopular multiregional speculation that states that cutting-aspect people advanced from diverse populations of homo erectus around the globe. instead a unmarried beginning speculation is well-known pointing out the well-known people arose from a unmarried small inhabitants in Africa and spread throughout the time of the international later giving upward push to diverse races. right that's an enticing actuality: people instruct a lot less mitochondrial genetic version than chimpanzees. that's loopy, proper?

2016-11-26 00:57:00 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Gosh no. Ask my wife she thinks that all men came from pigs. How could man ever come from monkeys. Race is another issue altogether, I thought that most racing came from NASCAR, well if your are from the south it is. Come to think of it may be that is where the human race came from, I mean it is only humans do that, so logically if humans race and NASCAR is racing. Then humans must have evolved from stock car racing.

May be that could be a religion? Football is, check out and college stadium on football Saturday. Think about it, thousands go to worship a little pigskin ball. Men go out on the field while thousands cheer, pray, and exalt. Looks like a religous experience to me. Did you notice that there was something about a pig in there? Just another reference to men coming from pigs. Maybe my wife is right?????

2006-08-18 15:01:44 · answer #4 · answered by Dead Man Walking 4 · 0 2

No. Read the Bible in Genesis chapter 1. You will see there that God created man in His own image. Evolution is a lie my friend.

If we evolved from monkeys why haven't we evolved anymore for more than 2000 years?

2006-08-18 14:55:12 · answer #5 · answered by Large Cop 2 · 0 2

Not from a monkey like species, more from an APE type species and also not like todays apes like some people think.

2006-08-18 14:50:00 · answer #6 · answered by Guywiththehir 3 · 0 1

Nope not true. A monkey is a monkey and a man is a man. Might have some features , but they are not related to man. They are a species all of their own.

2006-08-18 14:55:36 · answer #7 · answered by Norskeyenta 6 · 0 2

No. Are the human race and other species are supposed to improve as time goes on, even if everything else deteriorates as time goes by.

Ex.- bread (gets moldy as time goes by), batteries run out of acid, the list is endless.

2006-08-18 14:55:18 · answer #8 · answered by Haley 3 · 0 1

no, I believe that human beings evolved from the same ancestor that the monkeys and other primates evolved from.

2006-08-18 14:52:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Not really.

--
Speaking of evolution...

It is relevant to note that...

Darwinism is ultimately a statement of Atheist Faith.

As Evolutionist Stephen J. Gould has stated, evolutionists "know" that Evolution has occurred; however, there is controversy about the mechanisms involved. In other words, evolutionists are arguing and fighting about the mechanisms involved.

This is code-speak for the fact that evolutionists "believe" that evolution happened without God, but they dont really know exactly how. They have a bunch of conjectures and speculations, but they do not have empirical proof of atheistic macro*evolution.

--
There is no evidence that proves Atheistic MacroEvolution (without Intelligent Design)...

I used to believe in Evolution. However, over a period of time I have grown skeptical of the claims of Macro*Evolution... this is largely due to the weakness of the evidence for Macro*Evolution, and the fact that the evidence, rationally interpreted does not support the overarching claims made by Macro*Evolutionists...

For scientific and intellectual critiques of evolution, see http://www.godsci.org/gsi/apol/evo/00.html .

Is Evolution a FACT? Not really -- not in the macro*evolutionary sense. See http://www.godsci.org/gsi/apol/evo/evofaq2.html for relevant discussion.


---
I find that the vast majority of people who believe in evolution, do so by faith and authority.

Faith -- because atheistic macro*evolution is a faith; and Authority -- because they believe in the word of "experts" in the field, rather than truly understanding the evidence themselves.

Cordially,
John

2006-08-18 15:00:08 · answer #10 · answered by John 6 · 0 2

In no way, shape or form!
The idea is ridiculous.
For example, if we descended from apes, why do apes exist today?
Does that mean the apes of today will eventually become semi-humans?
When did we stop evolving and start producing via sex?

2006-08-18 14:53:39 · answer #11 · answered by Uncle Thesis 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers