Granted, we aren't using paper anymore, and no little van needs to drive across the country to deliver our 50g of pen-written pages. But what I'm trying to get to the bottom of is whether sending things electronically is actually more environmentally friendly when you consider all aspects involved. After all, computing requires electric power, which in turn may require power plants of questionable pedigree (oil, coal, etc.) to be run, which pump out CO2 which comes from fossil fuels - whereas trees actually absorb CO2 when they grow, and paper only releases the CO2 that was needed to grow the trees back into the atmosphere when (and if) burned at some stage. So, long story short: Are emails really that environmentally friendly? And if so, by what margin, do you think, are they superior to paper-based messaging systems? Could it be that it depends on the number of emails you send per day? Or how quickly you fire them out, then shut down the workstation? Just wondering...
2006-08-18
14:34:21
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Tahini Classic
7
in
Environment