English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-18 12:32:04 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

21 answers

Who said it was? I'm not and I have no desire to be. Some religious people get on my nerves, but to each his/her own.

2006-08-18 12:38:30 · answer #1 · answered by ok 4 · 2 0

I don't think it's bad to be religious but I think it's bad when people who are religious try and ram it down everyone's throat! I am somewhat religious but believe that religion is private. I certainly don't try & make people believe the same things as me, in fact I embrace people of other faiths because of their different opinions. Unfortunately other's can't accept that! Religion is just an excuse for everything anyway - it's usually about money, power, land or oil!

2006-08-18 12:41:20 · answer #2 · answered by sammydog_uk 2 · 0 0

There is a popular analogy used to show that all religions are valid ways to describe God. Religion professors especially love this philosophic analogy, because it equalizes all religions, making all religions equally "true" in their description of God.

The analogy is this: there are four blind men who discover an elephant. Since the men have never encountered an elephant, they grope about, seeking to understand and describe this new phenomenon. One grasps the trunk and concludes it is a snake. Another explores one of the elephant's legs and describes it as a tree. A third finds the elephant's tail and announces that it is a rope. And the fourth blind man, after discovering the elephant's side, concludes that it is, after all, a wall.

Each in his blindness is describing the same thing: an elephant. Yet each describes the same thing in a radically different way.

According to many, this is analogous to the different religions of the world -- they are describing the same thing in radically different ways. Thus one should conclude that no individual religion has a corner on truth, but that all should be viewed as essentially equally valid.

This is a powerful and provocative image, and it certainly seems to capture something of the truth.

If God is infinite and we are finite, it is reasonable to believe that none of us can fully capture His nature. But does this philosophic analogy demonstrate the truth that all religions lead to God? To conclude that it does would ignore several points...

First, there is a fact of the matter: the elephant. What the blind men are attempting to describe is in fact an elephant, not something else. Just so, there are factual questions regarding God. "Does God even exist?" is a question of fact, much like, "Was Abraham Lincoln ever President of the United States?" If so, it would be true whether anyone believes it or not, and to deny it, one would be mistaken. Thus, not all opinions, whether concerning elephants or the nature of God, are equally true.

Second, all four blind men are, in fact, mistaken. It is an elephant and not a wall or a rope or a tree or a snake. Their opinions are not equally true -- they are equally, and actually false. At best, such an analogy of religious pluralism would show that all religions are false, not true.

Third, and most important, the philosophic analogy does not take into account any kind of special revelation. If a fifth man were to arrive on the scene, one who could see (and who was able to demonstrate his credentials of having sight), and he were to describe the elephant as an elephant, then it would change the analogy entirely.

Jesus Christ, unique among all religious leaders of history, claimed to be such a "fifth man," a definitive revelation of God. Many of the people who watched Jesus' miracles and heard him speak were offended by his clear statements about his deity. "This was why [they] sought all the more to kill him, because he not only broke the sabbath but also called God his own Father, making himself equal with God."1

Jesus however, invited us to believe in him if we want our search for God satisfied... "I am the bread of life; he who comes to me shall not hunger, and he who believes in me shall never thirst."2

Want to check out Jesus' reliability to be this "fifth man"? See the feature article Beyond Blind Faith.

1 John 5:18
2 John 6:35

2006-08-18 12:40:52 · answer #3 · answered by poorboychristian 3 · 0 0

It depends what you mean by religious. Sometimes religious means "spiritual" in which case it is wonderful and very good. Soemtimes it means 'belittling all those who do not believe or behave exactly as I do" in which case it is demeaning and dangerous (look at the Salem Witch Trials and tell me there how many of those people should have been killed?) Hope this helps your conscientous evaluation.

2006-08-18 12:38:44 · answer #4 · answered by swarr2001 5 · 2 0

It is not bad to be religious. But the spiritual part is more important. I could go to church and sing songs and read scriptures and not know God. To me it is important to be close to God. . .to walk in His presence and to follow Christ. Some are satisfied with much less. I can not judge. I just want more than that.

2006-08-18 13:02:03 · answer #5 · answered by cathyhewed1946 4 · 0 0

It's only bad to be religious when religion is used to justify hatred towards another group of people, such as the way Medieval Christians used the Bible to justify anti-Semitism.

2006-08-18 12:39:14 · answer #6 · answered by Nowhere Man 6 · 2 0

Why is it bad to be superstitious?
Religion has been the cause of war and murder, oppression and misery all over the world since the dawn of human history. Only advances in science/knowlege have set men free and secure.

2006-08-18 12:39:43 · answer #7 · answered by the-agitator@sbcglobal.net 1 · 0 0

It is not bad.
In fact is really great.
You do what some else tells you to, you don't have to think,
you are told what you are doing is the RIGHT thing, and that
you will be rewarded, and you know exactly what to
do at all times, since everything is clearly spelled out by someon else.
Its great. In fact, its a no-brainer

2006-08-18 12:41:28 · answer #8 · answered by ahddub316 2 · 0 0

There is absolutely nothing wrong with being religious. In fact, it's the only thing that would feed your soul. People with out religion are people who lost in life. As for me, if it wern't for religion I might as well be dead. I am greatful being who I am, with god's presence my life I nothing. Everything that I own and have is because god filled my life with.

2006-08-18 12:43:38 · answer #9 · answered by Irene A 2 · 0 0

Thats a matter of opinion. If your religion, your faith doesnt interfere with the lives of others. Meaning if you're not one of those bible thumping weirdos, so what if you believe in whatever religion you wanna believe in. Wanna be a Muslim, go ahead, Jew, go for it, Christian, why not. Religion is a belief, and generally speaking the message in almost all religions is to do good unto your fellow man.

2006-08-18 12:41:37 · answer #10 · answered by jeff the drunk 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers