Which is more accurate? Evolution or Evilution?

Answer 1

AMSVDBS

Another
Moron
Seeking
Validation
(of their)
Deluded
Belief
System

Answer 2

evolution must refer to some archaic judo-christian mambo-jumbo.
Evolution is a well founded scientific theory. And before I go any further lets just straighten out theory for all you idiots out there who didn't pay attention in science class...or just didn't take science.
Theory: A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena.
For all those "creationist, Intelligent Design types" Evolution is a science. Religion is not PERIOD.
There are no "hole" in the theory
There is no "doubt" in the scientific community
If you have done any research at all, and had any clue as to what the hell you where talking about you would know this to be the case.
Evolution says nothing about religion. It does say that the earth is around 4.5 billion years old...not 6000.

Answer 3

If you define "Evilution" as the straw man that creationists keep trying to construct, then "Evolution" is more accurate. Evolution is the theory describing the process by which species change over time. It has nothing to do with the origins of life, morality, the birth of the universe, the formation of the planets, or any of the rest. If you have a problem with any of that, then your problem is with geology, planetology, astronomy, anthropology, chemistry, biochemistry, physica, gravitational physics, quantum physics...and most of science in general.

Answer 4

Evolution is the accurate term. There is no such word as evilution. That's a christian's way of attempting to degrade the very means of which he got here.

Answer 5

Evolution is far more accurate. Your word, "evilution", evolved from evolution.

Answer 6

Hmm. Well, since we're in the world of real knowledge and rational argument, let us consider the ramifications of your stupefying scientific/theological discovery...

Which is more artistic? Monet or Manet?

Which is more prevalent? Theocracy or Democracy?

Which is more relevant? Neologism or Neurotropism?

Which is more cromulent? Wait--is cromulent a word?

You should write the American Academy of Science immediately. They will surely capitulate and acknowledge the theoretical supremacy of Unintelligible Design to the consensus of scientific evidence and knowledge on the basis of your jeu de mot.

Answer 7

Evolution is a scientific fact. Evilution is silly wordplay.

Answer 8

Evolution(you're looking 4 the correct spelling right).

Answer 9

well gotta say evolution, i believe most of the theory and all of the fact. just so much disinformation out there it takes a long time to sift through it. just for the sake of it, i believe we were seeded from the stars. it's a bastard mix between evolution and creationism. awesome to talk about when your at a bbq and wasted : )

Answer 10

Only a fool would think a scientific theory could be evil.

But then again I bet other ignorant frightened theists thought Copernicus and Galileo's Sun center theory was also evil.

Answer 11

That depends on if you view the fact that we haev evloved to being evil or if you think it is just nature of things. How do you feel? Do you really think that some god waded up a hand full of dirt and spit in it and said let there be man? lol you are a joke.