English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Can you imagine how homoerotic that must've been? Jesus's naked, heaving body being tied down by those muscular soldiers... the S&M of the whole thing... I doubt he could've helped himself.

2006-08-18 12:01:09 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

20 answers

yeah it is kind of bad to ask something like that when he was being crucified, but I wonder how Jesus handled it during his life. you know at some point he got an erection because he was a man and functional. not to say he had any impure thoughts. curious , how did he deal with this? It must have been hard for him. It is important for a man to get an erection even if it is not for sexual reasons because it keeps the penis healthy. no erection no blood flow and the penis will literally dry up over a period of time. have to kepp your penis healthy. no joke or pun intended.

2006-08-18 12:25:58 · answer #1 · answered by chris a 2 · 1 1

Since his soul (his blood) was pouring out upon the ground, from the spear jabbed in his side near his heart, and he was slowly suffocating from being hung from a branchless tree (original translation of the word), with his hands nailed above his head (as was traditional in Jewish executions), I doubt his body had either enough blood or oxygen to do such a thing.

2006-08-18 12:09:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Would you get excited if someone nailed you to a cross? Give me a break! Anyway, Jesus wasn't naked; plus, He was sinless. Take that for what it's worth.

2006-08-18 12:08:42 · answer #3 · answered by Moxie Crimefighter 6 · 1 3

I don't imagine he would have done. Ask Jonathan, he sounds like he may be an erection. Don't think you're headed for hell either. It was only a question.

2006-08-18 12:10:18 · answer #4 · answered by Robin H 4 · 0 3

I'm not sure about Jesus, but I know that Mel Gibson did.

2006-08-18 12:07:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

I doubt anyone that's alive now was there at the time. And I think you'd better be on your knees tonight apologizing for your vulgar remark regarding YOUR Savior! You're disgusting.

2006-08-18 12:07:29 · answer #6 · answered by class act 4 · 4 3

Mark 3:29 But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation.

You are a sick twisted piece of crap!

2006-08-18 12:07:09 · answer #7 · answered by Carol M 5 · 4 4

some day you will remember that you said this ...
Homo erotic ?
S&m ? You WILL be called to recall this statement...
If you are trying to get attention , I would suggest that ..You are probably a good person that wants to stur up controversy......
You have succeded at that ..but I will not answer to your childishness other than this......

2006-08-18 12:11:15 · answer #8 · answered by cesare214 6 · 4 2

That's really just a stupid thing to say. I was trying to think of a scathing reply, but it's not even worth it.

2006-08-18 12:06:51 · answer #9 · answered by nimo22 6 · 4 2

HE was/is Jewish-- they were allowed a loin cloth.


( You have a very interesting mind!)

2006-08-18 12:07:43 · answer #10 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers