English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I just went to some random "Abortion is Murder" site where they had these "GRAPHIC, DISTURBING PICTURES!" These "GRAPHIC, DISTURBING PICTURES!" were supposed to bring people to tears and con them into being pro-life, I guess. Didn't work on me. They were actually kind of cool. They didn't look like people, just blobs of squished tomato with random hands. If their mothers wanted to abort them so much, those embryos are probably better off than if they'd been born. Their faces weren't gruesomely contorted to show horrible pain, they just looked like dumb, undeveloped embryos. They would probably grow up and be even more worthless parasites, so we're probably all better off without them.

2006-08-18 11:49:18 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health Other - Health

23 answers

Thank you for telling the truth. Alot of people here won't be
able to handle it, but, you are absolutely correct.
When I was not quite 2 yrs old, I almost died of ruptured
appendix. I don't remember a thing, like it could have happened
to someone else, except that I have the scars to prove it.

Look at Adrea Yates, maybe if she didn't have so many
babies in a row, some of them would still be alive.

And, if people still want to think a cytoplast is a human being,
what about all of those wasted sperm? I mean, geez,
think they could have been somebody?!
Ridiculous.

2006-08-18 12:00:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

You know, I just watched a documentary on the genocide in Rwanda, and some of the people who were killed there also looked "squished...with random hands" and didn't have "gruesomely contorted" faces. Does that mean it was okay to kill them? Does that prove they didn't feel any distress as they were murdered? I suppose some people would even say that they were "worthless parasites" and that we're "probably better off without them." (Notice how it's always the people who aren't in danger of being killed who make statements like these?)

Killing innocent people is always wrong. Abortion always kills an innocent person.

And, by the way, unborn babies DO feel pain, possibly as early as 7 weeks after conception:

http://www.advocatesfortheinnocent.com/fetalpain.html

2006-08-19 18:57:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

There are so many different people who have so many different views about abortion that it is hard to give a "right" answer. No matter how they were conceived, every baby has/had a purpose. It is ultimately the woman's choice to bring the child to term because it is HER body. It seems like there are some women who could care less about the babies they are churning out, but they just keep on doing it. Then there are women like me, who want so desperately to have a baby, and have had no luck...it does not seems fair. For that reason, I do get angry at women who can get pregnant so easily and choose to "get rid of" such a precious gift. On the other hand, there have been some terrible people in the world born that should not have been. I read a "rest of the story" piece by Paul Harvey one time that was about two different women in different situations who were trying to decide whether or not to abort their unwanted pregnancy. One was Van Gough's mother, and the other was Hitler's. So, on one hand if Van Gough's mother had made that decision, such beautiful art would never had been known...and on the other, if Hitler's mother had made that decision, the world would have been spared such unbelievable pain, cruelty, and torture.

2006-08-18 19:15:15 · answer #3 · answered by pixiechic_77 3 · 1 1

Abortion is so bad because life begins at conception, not birth. Those embryos are human beings being murdered. If a person is mature and responsible enough to have sex, then they are mature and responsible enough to carry a baby to term. After that there are other options. There are a lot of couples that are not able to have children and can adopt those kids that aren't wanted by their mothers. Every child has a purpose. God made every baby for a reason; He has a purpose for their lives, who are we to take that away. We do have a right to make our own decisions about our own bodies, but abortion kills the body of an innocent unborn child, not us. Our actions have consequences; it makes the problem worse if we cover up one sin with another.

2006-08-18 19:13:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

It isnt murder till after 6 months thats why it is legal to have an abortion till your 6 months pregnant, it isnt a human being till 6 months. this girl at my school had an abortion at 7 months now thats a different story there that is murder, and she was actually almost gonna get sent to jail but i dont think they could cause she was only 16, if you get an abortion before 6 months thats fine but if you get one after 6 months then thats a different story.

2006-08-20 08:38:08 · answer #5 · answered by Lance 2 · 0 0

I agree w/ you. I have checked out the pics, and they didn't bother me even to NOT get an abortion if I so choose. In my opinion, until the fetus can breathe ON IT'S OWN.....(breathing air is an indication of BEING ALIVE.) then it is not "alive" to begin w/. CHOICE......WHAT A BEAUTIFUL RIGHT! As far as growing up as "worthless parasites"......I don't know about that. There are alot of planned pregnancies that resulted in worthless parasites too! Example: think about all the right-to-lifers that insist on butting into other people's life.....NOW THERE ARE SOME WORTHLESS PARASITES!

2006-08-18 19:01:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Abortion should not be used "frivolously" .... however there may be a situation where you may want to have an aborttion ~ the "old two headed baby trick"...I would want to be aborted if there was some type of GROSS mutation like that that I would be a part of.....

2006-08-20 10:00:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You're such a cute little girl...nobody would ever know you once looked like one of those little squashed tomatoes with random hands. Honestly, kids like you make me wonder if I am really all that "pro-life" after all. If only we could tell ahead of time which li'l tomatoes would grow into total turds...well, maybe science will eventually develop a turd test, and we can abort the rotten little heel biters before we waste good money on diapers for them.......

2006-08-18 19:58:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

if people just use condoms etc abortion wouldnt be needed. they only time i belive abortion is acceptable is in cases where the unborn baby has SERIOUS health problems or in cases where the mother was raped.(but even in this case there adoption) people who go around using abortion as a form of birth control dont deserve kids,

2006-08-18 19:07:02 · answer #9 · answered by mrs nevz 3 · 1 2

It is not a baby when it is aborted, it is called a zygot, a clump of cells that has the potential to be a baby but is not one yet. Babies are capable of breathing on their own and living outside the womb.

2006-08-18 18:56:40 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers