Other than nuclear weapons,which modern weapon is more destrutive and which country owns it?

Question

The great powers america,russia,china are wielding mass destructive weapons such as nuclear bomb,missile etc.But other than nucleat associated weapons,what is the most dangerous weapon than nuclear energy,and which countriy wields it.For example U.S had particle laser beam,which will direct the powerful laser beam through satellite,to enemy bases and destroys them.Russia wields biologically dangerous submarines which may contaminate the entire water wealth of a particular country.What is the most most dangerous weapons other than nuclear

Answer 1

the most destructive weapon out there right now I would say is vx gas, i drop the size of lincolns eye on a penny is all it takes to kill a person in the matter of 3 minutes. a tablespoon could take out most midsize cities with the right winds, and all this can be smuggled EASILY into any area, a nuke, is harder to deliver and takes more to cause the same amount of deaths. and as far as who has it? well MOST countries do, to INCLUDE the former iraqi regime (yes there is proof, look at the thousands of dead kurds that were a result of a vx gas attack ordered by saddam hussein, and people want to say they didn't have wmd's)

Answer 2

The weapon more powerfull then a nuclier weapon is a
anti matter bomb. Matter and Anti Matter have to be fused to destroy an entire country. Who posseses it? Russia are close to
with EMP transponders which can really hurt the world and the
U.S ofcourse and China is devoloping it still. India with the aid from Russia and the U.S are getting it. Thats right India the
peacefull little third world country that nobody really thinks is
powerfull enough even when they just got a satalite based missile
system that could pulberise anyone that will piss them off.

Answer 3

Its probably biological and there are numerous countries that have programs and projects that are being developed. Nuclear and laser weapons target specific and limited areas where as bio and chem weapons have unlimited and uncontrollable boundaries they can drift or be carried to. Bio weapons can be developed to show no symptoms for days or weeks and by that time it will have spread world wide before it even shows its lethal effects. The problem with using these kinds of weapons is being able to vaccinate a countries population without alerting the rest of the world. Bio weapons could in reality be a planet type killer weapon. Imagine developing a bio weapon that targets people that drink camels milk or eat sheep. It can be used to target genetically types of people such as white, black, Indian, oriental, and Arab people. Scary thought eh.

Answer 4

it is actual not person-friendly to conceal the glee in Iran, What are there, one hundred twenty million Iranians? regularly placed in the more effective genteel northern latitudes. 6 thousand centrifuges whirling alongside taking the 235 and getting the most bang for the dollar. ultimately the huge stick. the affection of all of it is the sale and shipping of spare nukes to the likes of Sudan. The Peace of the Lord is getting shot complete of radioactive shrapnel. lets nuke or invade? What might want to Jesus do? Will the tanks of capitalism upward push to the project and grind those pupils/mullahs/targets to products formerly conflict can destroy out? lets have a negotiated conflict, sparing the planet of harm, yet eliminating pesky human sorts. 12,000 3-6 magatonners geared in course of Iran by technique of another nuke power. constructive we believe them, yet as R.Reagan reported, 'decrease the playing cards'.

Answer 5

Neutron bombs are the most frightening to me. They literally vaporize all living tissues, and buildings still stand erect. Basically, you cook in your own juices until you are nothing but a few ounces of charred and steamed plasma and bones. I know the US has a few, for sure. We are always allowed to have stuff like that, but if another country has it, it's a WMD. I love that double standard. It's so messed up.

http://www.manuelsweb.com/neutronbomb.htm
http://chemistry.about.com/b/a/198779.htm

Sounds fun, 'eh? Why do they even NEED something like this? Just evil. Simple bullets do a fine job of slaughtering innocent people.

Answer 6

Two weapons. One is the 2nd most powerful, the fuel air bomb, only the US has it. But the VX chemical weapon can kill with just less than a drop. Once again, the US only has it.

Answer 7

All the strategic weapons in the world don't mean s*** unless you have soldiers with rifles to take and hold ground.

Answer 8

The most destructive weapons in the world must be WAR LOVING LEADERS!!!!!

Answer 9

There are Neutron Bombs that are more destructive than Atom Bombs because they will killed all humans only and no property will be destroyed.Only USA and England are having it.

Answer 10

The new bunker busters have the same effect as tactical nukes without the fallout....