Their aint no prollum wit mi spells.
Heh...
I suppose it's because highschool students use the site. Honestly, how many care about "there, they're and their", "to, too and two", "way, weigh and whey", and so on?
2006-08-17 22:10:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
it truly is because of lack of interest in studying perfect spelling and grammar. utilising prevalent English needs an effective history , education and interest. via ways did you spell Grammar as Grammer to make a level !! colleges are education and there are impressive instructors even if it truly is for the scholars and oldsters to stroll the more beneficial mile to be able of benefit what utilization is ideal and what's not. And with television and computers chewing up the spare time of babies they are not allocating high quality time in examining prevalent literary works and English classics.the different reason you locate some people right here not typing solid spelling might want to not be lack of recognize-how of English yet lack of solid typing skills , it truly is the reason behind varied mistakes at the moment.
2016-11-05 02:03:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Enough already, what is it with you people who constantly go on about grammar and spelling, have you not go the gist of this yet, it is a web site for questions and answers allowing people to have a) LOL fun or b) have problems solved.
It is a website not an English exam in a classroom, chill out.
2006-08-17 22:16:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Shouldn't it be, "Why is both the grammar and spelling of so many correspondents posting on this web site so poor?"
Really should spell check when you are blasting other people's grammar... but other than that, I agree with you.
2006-08-17 22:09:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by merigold00 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is Grammar and not "Grammer"
It is "Correspondent" and not "Correspondant"
"Why is both the" is a poor sentence structure.
Like Charity, English also starts at Home.
2006-08-17 22:15:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by ks_anand_77 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
English has many homophones (similar-sounding words) and (unlike German, for example) is very loose in terms of phonetics. So it's faster to think of what the word sounds like, and write it that way, rather than what makes grammatical sense in the context of the sentence.
This is what leads to people writing "should of" instead of "should have" and "I saw there car" instead of "I saw their car". You just need to slow down a little and do a quick grammar re-check of what you've just written or typed.
2006-08-17 22:44:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by BryanIRL 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ovbouisly the asekr of tihs qesuiotn is bineg an ioidt, but, iterenstngily, appratnley you olny need the frist and lsat ltteres to be in oderr to uednrsnatd the wrdos anwayy, so who creas aoubt the selpling?
2006-08-17 22:15:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by johninmelb 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I totally agree with you. Sometimes it is difficult to know what people are actually saying. By the way, you spelled correspondents and grammar wrong!!!
I hate it when people say something is different to something else. It should be different from.
2006-08-17 22:11:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ladyfromdrum 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hi,
It is not that all who post on this website have poor grammar and spellings just a lil offway written English.
'Their' comes where you have belonging or possessive case coming in. 'There' is used when its more related to places/locations. So just remember this basic funda and you will not go wrong...
2006-08-17 22:11:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by cutie 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I have often asked myself the same thing. Particularly in relation to those who cannot spell 'grammar' correctly, or 'correspondent' for that matter.
2006-08-17 22:10:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Here's Danny 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
People from all over the world use the site, so they will misspell words, use incorrect words, its bound to happen with english.
Their - There, Witch - Which, Whose - Who's, Etc.
Also some people cut words short to save time.
2006-08-17 22:11:14
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋