And did you see the interview with the college professor (what a jerk)
2006-08-17 18:30:44 · 16 answers · asked by Ned B 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
I don't think he did it, I think he's just crazy.
The killer was comfortable enough to sit down in the house and write a three page "ransom" note. The killer managed to go to the correct bedroom to get the girl without waking anyone else.
The killer wrote the note on a pad of paper belonging to the Ramsey's using a pen that also belonged to the Ramsey's.
The "ransom" note makes reference to a specific amount ...$118,000 ... the exact amount of a recent bonus for Mr. Ramsey. The number of suspects who would have this specific knowledge is VERY short.
The amount is rather low for a ransom, indicating the criminal is rather oddly unfamiliar with money.
The note has three quotes from action movies, such as "Don't try to grow a brain."
There were no signs of a forced entry into the house. Just a window that was "faulty".
The killer made the garrot from one of Patsy's paint brushes.
The DNA is very suspect. The miniscule amount collected took eight years to develope into a profile. Plenty of time for contamination.
There was no semen and the autopsy was unconclusive as to sexual assault.
The murder occurred on Christmas day, a time of stress for many families. Statistically, a murder on a holiday will be committed by a family member. Think Scott and Lacey Peterson.
Obviously the murderer is a family member. And obviously the family knows which of them did it. If either parent did it, they would have turned on the other.
But they WOULD protect their only remaining child.
The note can be found on the web. Read it for yourself. It is the work of a precocious nine year old who saw one too many action film.
2006-08-17 18:36:18 · answer #1 · answered by dewdropinn 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
From what I saw yesterday, Kerr didn't so much confess as make admissions against interest.
Evidently he knows that DNA and other evidence ties him to the crime scene. He is naively trying to downgrade the crime from first degree murder to something less. He's unlikely to succeed in any case (the person who acts as his own lawyer has a fool for a client). And he is not enttled to Miranda warnings or full (if any) constitutional protections while in custody of the Thai police. Nor any particular extradition protection (Ker-Frisbie doctrine; Alvarez-Machain US Supreme Court case).
Look: anybody who says, seriously, that he "loved" a 5-year-old whom he then tortured and killed may not be legally insane, but certainly lacks reason. Nothing should surprise you as this case develops.
I certainly hope that Steve Thomas never gets remunerative employment again. I have seen countless people railroaded in miscarriages of justice where police and prosecutors were so convinced of an innocent person's guilt that they concealed exculpatory evidence, misrepresented evidence that did exist, and in the event of an acquittal refused to look for another suspect.
2006-08-18 01:38:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The guy is sick in the mind just look at the he acts his eyes, face, body language. I don't believe he did it he might be a pervert but a killer no. he's doing it for the fame and because he's infatuated with Jon Benet the the child beauty pageant Queen.
2006-08-18 01:41:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
from the interview and the info I've seen so-far, i say no, he didn't do it, he just wants the recognition and the twisted celebrity status that goes with it. The majority of the evidence still points at a family member, only time will tell or will it?
2006-08-18 01:53:06 · answer #4 · answered by zac 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think this just might be a hoax from the stuff ive heard on the news. i hope they can match up the DNA with him and will end it but something is just a little fishy to me.
2006-08-18 01:36:19 · answer #5 · answered by topher1633 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He is VERY strange looking indeed.
They tested his DNA so hopefully we hear something soon.
Did you see on TV - he looks like the picture a psychic drew of the killer! (Chris Cuomo's thing on TV tonight.)
2006-08-18 01:51:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe he killed her.
I believe he is a sick perv and he wants to be
extradited to the U.S. before they behead him
for being the president of the "Uncle Perv Club".
2006-08-18 02:33:19 · answer #7 · answered by Moma 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't believe it was him he looks abit of a plonker in my eyes i think he is just looking for some people to take notice of him
respect
shaz
2006-08-18 12:05:20 · answer #8 · answered by sharon B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he did it. There are reasons why he confessed that will be explained later.
2006-08-18 01:36:03 · answer #9 · answered by EMAILSKIP 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Im with Ben. I dont think he did it maybe he was apart of it but i dont think he was the one to kill her
2006-08-18 01:35:42 · answer #10 · answered by tickledpink6754 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋