We'd save billions in the national budget, and the workforce would be chock-full of people working their butts off and generating a huge economy boost for everyone. Taxes could be decreased, and businesses would flourish. What do y'all think?
2006-08-17 15:45:43 · 21 answers · asked by Micah T Redding 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Rock on, that's the best answer I've seen around these parts!!!
2006-08-17 16:06:53 · answer #1 · answered by Carol R 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
i think of it would crush some international locations which could no longer cope with surprising inhabitants explosions. each and every us of a has it relatively is organic components and if a surprising inflow of persons enter the country, the country in question ought to bypass bankrupt. maximum folk attempting to bypass away an oppressive regime are detrimental and can't hop a airplane to Canada or the u . s . or France. they might purely bypass to the neighboring us of a. If the North Koreans all went to China, China would have an relatively no longer common time helping the North Koreans. China is, nevertheless super, unquestionably a detrimental us of a and easily can slightly cope with the persons they have there now. additionally, till the international adopts one sort of government, the open border coverage would foster resentment and permit terrorists to come again and bypass freely with out probability for seize. There would be suicide bombings in each and every of the cities of each and every of the international locations the terrorists are not allied with.
2016-10-02 05:33:59 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you forget about education and rules regarding emergency care at hospitals?
I think you did. The public school systems and other public services would decline in quality, as now you have a ton of illegals that aren't paying taxes (cuz they don't have a SSN), causing a huge "drain" on the economy as a whole. I don't think you've thought your ridiculous idea through.
Our own citizens are struggling at the poverty levels in every city, barely able to take advantage of the public services that are there. Now you want to give an illegal Mexican the chance for a free ride? Doesn't make sense to me...
2006-08-17 16:09:12 · answer #3 · answered by SirCharles 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We'd have to eliminate 'free' education and health care for the indigent, since those are the biggest costs.
I don't think we should turn our back on the basic principle of free education for all of our people just because others illegally try to steal our education funds.
2006-08-17 18:51:25 · answer #4 · answered by DAR 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good idea. I don't think the answer to needy people in our country is a wellfare system based on coerced taxation. I think it should be based on people's goodwill and gifts from their own hearts. This helps the people giving AND helps the people in need. Does it really make any sense to punish those of us who actually work to make money because some people refuse to work? And for those who CAN'T work...there are millions upon millions raised by philanthropic organizations each year that should be more than enough to cover that.
2006-08-17 16:00:08 · answer #5 · answered by josiahredding 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Not such a good plan. What about the people who actually need welfare? People who cant work because of injuries or illnesses, but do not have suficent funds to survive without a form of income?
2006-08-17 15:52:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
we cant, we would be so flooded with mexicans wanting jobs that they would go to the lowest bidder which would lower the economy and gdp, people wouldnt be able to buy anything and our economy would be ruined, then we would be just as shitty as mexico, thats why.
2006-08-17 15:55:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Then we could let all the terrorists in and let the children of sick and mentally ill people starve. Let's all write our Congresspeople!
2006-08-17 15:51:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
sounds like mexico except for the border thing!
2006-08-17 15:54:58 · answer #9 · answered by tripledigit67 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
It sounds great on paper but will never work in reality...sorry.
2006-08-17 16:22:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋