English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't think Fox would get there before gangs and the corrupt Mexican Military would? I think we see what the Mexicans are made of so why do we let them keep on treading on us ? Stand up America and screw the Government! Revolt and send the invaders home! Our naive niceness will result in the same slaughter the indians took if we wait for all to see the truth!

2006-08-17 14:50:29 · 25 answers · asked by tripledigit67 3 in Politics & Government Immigration

25 answers

Probably like Blair,

helping Bush created "terror"...

2006-08-17 14:54:22 · answer #1 · answered by The Patriot 4 · 1 3

No offense, yet i imagine the U.S. ought to leabe Mexico on my own. u.s. has it truly is personal complications with no need to spread it truly is protection rigidity skinny over 2 very unpopular warzones (Afghanistan and Iraq), both one in each and every of which have not been resolved. That, and u.s. has problems with Human Rights topics itself. Take Guantanamo Bay, case in element, and Abu Graib. With human rights documents like the States, i do not imagine they are in any more beneficial effectual a position to inform Mexico what to do about human rights. next up is the question of sovereignty; Mexico has, as does the States. only because Mexico has a nasty acceptance for Human Rights does not supply any united states the right to invade it. No united states has that good. some people say that the United united states's prevalent assertion of Human Rights is what's mandatory to fall back on to justify a majority of those moves, yet that rfile isn't legally binding. might want to america invade North Korea? authentic, they seem to be a dictatorship, and that united states is in the back of interior the tips of the international, even if america will probable ought to imagine genuine not user-friendly about invading them because North Korea is next door to China, the most important economic equipment in Asia, and the U.S. won't be able to have the funds for too many problems with them. the point i'm attempting to make is that invading Mexico only because of it truly is human rights record is a nasty theory. each and every united states has a heritage of having carried out something terrible both it truly is people or the people of different international places, and considering u.s. has the noble rationalization for bringing "regulation and Order" does not mean it would want to invade all and sundry.

2016-11-05 01:32:33 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Ok, America doesn't need to invade Mexico, all the Mexicans are here, or want to be.
Second, America used to belong, for the most part, TO MEXICO!!!
You need to read some history books, son.
Third, America has the best army, ever. In the HISTORY of our species, there has not been a better armed, trained or more aggressive military than ours.
Again, if you read more than comic books you would know that.

2006-08-17 15:10:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I think if America invaded Mexico only the people would be the beneficiaries, What Mexico needs to do is become a dictatorship have the US topple it and then spend billion of dollars in infrastructure. This would improve the condition of the whole nation so I think Fox would be happy, but then thier government couldn't be so corrupt.

2006-08-17 15:06:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

if America did invade Mexico, alot of Americans would fight against America for making such a bad call, i know i would because Mexico used to own most of America. Sorry to say this, but America would lose the war or face a very large amount of casualties because, not only would it start World War Three, but because alot of countries already are against America and there already fighting a war in the middle east. So i don't think America stands a big chance unless other countries help them, which i doubt because alot of countries wouldn't like America after suddenly breaking allies with Mexico. Therefor America would lose.
P.S. America HAS lost a war, The Vietnam War. Oh and Fox isn't president anymore, if you watch the news you would know Mexico has held elections.PEACE.

2006-08-17 15:28:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

what a joke,it is true hat the US has one of the most powerful army in the world but it lack of leadership,like it is happening in Iraq,if you are smart start thinking what you are going to do when most immigrants legal and illegal become one,because that is going to happen and there will be no bullets on the take over.

2006-08-18 07:29:59 · answer #6 · answered by juan p 2 · 0 0

Not all illegal immigrants are paramilitary drug runners, gang bangers, or slave smugglers. We should not invade mexico, but many things would become simpler if we merged with Canada and all of Central America. Hmm.. the North American Federation Treaty Act [NAFTA]?

2006-08-17 15:03:23 · answer #7 · answered by ERIC G 3 · 1 2

uh, what would the americans do when they invade mexico? every soldier bring an illegal immigrant with you? grab fox by the ear and tell him to take back every one of his citizens? take over the government?

oh, do you mean american citizens should invade mexico? why would they do that? what would that accomplish? your question just doesn't make sense.

2006-08-17 15:03:11 · answer #8 · answered by smack 3 · 0 1

Fox would call Bush ... Bush would **** bricks and immediately call off the army ... while holding a desperate speech about the necessity of comprehensive immigration reform .... meanwhile the Mexican army would cross our border and start slaughtering our by now unarmed forces ... Bush would go on national television and telling us we need comprehensive immigration reform ... and on and on it would go ....

2006-08-17 15:04:38 · answer #9 · answered by Sashie 6 · 3 1

this has happened before in history, 1800's, at that time there was only gold and slaves to be had. times have changed, it would be (such) as NOM all over again. i am not in the service, so i could and only pray for those that are.

2006-08-17 15:02:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

That piece of.....Well, He'd be throwing up a white flag quicker than a beaner across the river. Seriously, did you see how (relatively) quickly we took Bahgdad? No problemo !!

2006-08-17 15:00:29 · answer #11 · answered by Heinrich Himmler 2 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers