English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

about how long would it take cuba to be secured?

2006-08-17 14:34:08 · 9 answers · asked by Beaujock 1 in Politics & Government Military

9 answers

About as long as it took to 'secure' Iraq.

2006-08-17 14:59:54 · answer #1 · answered by normobrian 6 · 0 0

It's really about the will to fight. That's something we just don't know about the Cuban people. Also, Cuba isn't giving the US a reason to invade. Cuba isn't sponsoring international terrorism and will probably get left alone by the US, even if there are a series of bloody coups following the eventual and inevitable death of Castro.

If there is no will to fight in the Cuban people, a combined Marine/Airborne assault could likely control Cuba in less than a week. Should the Cubans resist I would expect any guerrilla fighting to end in less than a year, no one is capable of smuggling arms, equipment, and insurgents across the Caribbean Sea against the will of the US Navy.

2006-08-17 14:46:10 · answer #2 · answered by Will B 3 · 0 0

Assuming we wanted to invade Cuba, why would we conduct an amphibious assault? It would be much easier to launch a land assault from Guantanamo Bay Naval Base. Were you even aware we have a naval base on the island of Cuba? Or did you think it was just a prison in Florida?

2006-08-17 14:45:52 · answer #3 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 0 0

Why is it every single problem around the world needs to have military involvement, but nobody seems to support the idea of war. You seem like the type that wants to ***** about the war in Iraq not being properly justified but also wants to push for military presence in Cuba even though you know there isnt any reason to be there. Sure you could argue that its a communist regime, but honestly they dont threaten our way of life and we dont have any "economic interests" there.

2006-08-17 14:41:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

it relatively is a honest question. Why can we go with a Marine Corps as quickly as we've military Rangers and different particular instruments that fill comparable roles? to coach the question around, why can we go with Rangers as quickly as we've the Marine Corps with its own air rigidity to grant air conceal and air delivery, and the army to grant maritime transportation and scientific centers? submit to in techniques that we've a Fleet Marine Corps in the two the Atlantic and Pacific that are set up with a Marine Air Wing, a Marine branch that includes infantry, armored and artillery instruments, a logistics team, and army ships and help instruments. real we've Marine instruments on ships located close to ability concern spots. An attack deliver can very without delay land 2,000 Marines utilising helicopters and amphibious automobiles. they do no longer ought to matter on friendly international locations to grant air strips or docks. submit to in techniques that the army and Air rigidity has to matter on such international locations as Saudi Arabia and Qatar to accomplish operations interior the middle East. Marines do no longer ought to ask truthfully absolutely everyone's permission. except the army and Air rigidity can do this --and that they are able to't, they have not got the fact, way of existence or kit-- you go with a Marine Corps. submit to in techniques that 3 of the main severe suggestions interior the U.S. defense force interior the final one hundred years have been developed via the Marines: amphibious attack; close air help, and; vertical envelopment. for people who think of the army can habit amphibious landings, submit to in techniques that lots of the adversarial landings interior the Pacific in WWII have been finished via Marines. the place the army met heavy opposition, which incorporate in Okinawa, the Marines had to save them. interior the main important landing of all at Omaha and Utah seashores in Normandy, the army bungled it via sitting on the sea coast all day waiting for the armor to come again ashore (lots of the tanks sunk offshore). That value hundreds of yankee casualties and at the back of schedule the breakout. 3 Divisions of Marines might have secured the beachhead in 12 hours and enable the army land their armor on the shore. regrettably, they have been in any different case occupied on Okinawa.

2016-12-11 10:40:52 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Secured for what? Why bother? If the Cubans want to be free after Castro let them do it. If the want to continue being communist thats fine too. It's their country, let them stand up for what they want, other peoples have.

2006-08-18 02:49:54 · answer #6 · answered by kristycordeaux 5 · 0 0

I say about a month with no air support. 2 weeks with air support.

2006-08-17 14:42:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ummm...3 days, 2 without the army.

j/k honestly i don't have a clue.

2006-08-17 14:40:42 · answer #8 · answered by RunningOnMT 5 · 1 0

Why would you do this?

2006-08-17 14:39:39 · answer #9 · answered by Hathor 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers