English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I know it's boring to ask about stuff like this, but I read a book called the Hornet's Nest and it talks about what the Southern colonies were thinking during the Rev. War, and it just really got me thinking why was there so much concentration on the North and not as much on the South.

2006-08-17 12:57:37 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Civic Participation

If you know of any good websites that can explain it good, can you please tell me about it???

2006-08-17 13:04:39 · update #1

8 answers

Most of the population resided in the north. Most of the south at that time was rural.

It was about people and money.

2006-08-17 13:02:07 · answer #1 · answered by Jon H 5 · 1 0

Slavery grow to be merely an aspect difficulty, and every person who says diverse desires to truly analyze. It grow to be all about the South's rights. inspite of if the slavery wasn't an difficulty, their perspectives might want to have clashed on something else, beginning a conflict. The North got here down and reported, "no more effective slavery." inspite of the undeniable fact that the entire South's economic gadget grow to be in accordance to it, they couldn't merely provide up slavery inspite of in the adventure that they needed to. The Southern states knew that they had rights, and that the North grow to be attempting to overpower them. that's the rationalization the South fought back. there have been 4 Northern states with slaves besides, border states, yet they were each now and then compensated. Lincoln did not loose any slaves. The Emancipation Proclamation did not loose every person. It grow to be a unnecessary rfile. As for independent, examine Gods and Generals, Killer Angels, and different Michael or Jeff Shaara books. they're advised in novel format, it really is tremendous and common to ascertain. it is all thoroughly authentic, besides. once you've the different questions, be at liberty to ask.

2016-11-25 23:13:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The North won and the South lost. Its all a matter of perspective, the forefathers of this country are revered as heroes because the revolution succeeded. Had they lost, they would have a far different position in history. I think its the same reason that Indians massacred white settlers and the whites fought off savages. All a matter of perspective.

2006-08-17 13:35:25 · answer #3 · answered by rico3151 6 · 0 0

Much of the south in the war was still owned by france

2006-08-17 13:03:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hisory and Geography - the 13 colonies were the first place settlers landed, the first place to get " organized" the first place to feel the effects of the British import tarrifs, the British legislations etc. since they were the first place that British ships landed. Everyone was annoyed, they just got the annoyances first, and were more
organized.

2006-08-17 13:05:57 · answer #5 · answered by robert g 2 · 0 0

The south did not want to get involved.
The south has never wanted to get involved with anything from the north.
that is why during the war between the states we tried to break free because they were coming down here and raping, robbing and pillaging our communities.

2006-08-17 13:03:30 · answer #6 · answered by Trollhair 6 · 0 0

thats where most of the money and the people were. when the thing started about one third wanted to fight one third wanted to stay under the english thumb and one third did not care one way or the other. most of the trade went on in the north so there was more at stake for them

2006-08-17 13:08:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think because it was industrial in the north and agricultural in the south.

2006-08-17 16:40:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers