This question is rhetoric....
I voted for Bush in 2000, I am legally not allowed to vote for reasons having to do with sensitive information found in Iraq...
As much as you'd like to debate Iraq, and how we didn't need to go there-- cus there was nothing there-- think again.. You don't know $h!t!!...
And because I do, I have to pay a price for it...Besides this,
It doesn't matter-- it happened anyway-- there is nothing you can do about it.
Bush compulsively lied before he even set foot in the Presidential elections in '99.
Along side of that, he and the current admin, along with the Liberal party have formed together to make NAFTA, CAFTA, and the North American Union a dream...
...This dream is still under the rock to many people-- as only a small percentage really know what's going on.
Look it up!
--Rob
2006-08-17 12:20:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by stealth_n700ms 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
For the poor people that voted for Mr.Bush you have my sympathy, there are none so foolish as those that follow a fool. But there is a cure coming in 2008 for the damage done to this country's honor,and respect by Bush...He has made America a laughing stock to the worlds community..I am so looking forward to the time when we as Americans can once again be proud of this great country's President...... There's a very distinct difference in being gutsy and being reckless with thousands of American lives,gutsy is fighting the war, not causing it. Bush is a liar and a hypocrite and hides behind his false religious beliefs to continue to scam you poor people.The only god Bush knows is green and its money.
2006-08-17 19:34:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Yakuza 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
it's funny and very interesting to see how many people voted for him because, even though he didn't accomplish what he was supposed to in the first election, they didn't like Kerry. So they go ahead and vote for Bush, even though they are other candidates that might have been better than Bush or Kerry, they chose for Bush. I personally didn't neither election but I know people who did. I understand the first election because, like any other candidate, they promise many things they do not accomplish. Yet, seeing how the US economy fell with him and how he was not doing his job as the president, I would never again trust him with the presidency. Yet people did.
2006-08-17 19:41:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by mcbcagirl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think those who voted for Bush wanted to see more classic Bush moments like the wonderful private conversation he had with Blair
2006-08-17 20:37:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Skyeboi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Go to Yahoo and do an image search of "Red States County by County) I think you'll find the truth - the Red is Bush, the Blue is Kerry. I voted for Bush and I'm extremely thankful to God he is in the White House. All Democrats hate him because he's gutsy and they are marshmellows. He's also a God and Country man. In the face of all adversity and all hateful things being said about him, he stands rock solid on his convictions and he has never said one bad word about any of his opponents. He's a good man. who would never dream of indulging in any sexual activity in the oval office while our soldiers were being drug through the streets of Mogadeshu. May God stay by his side!!!!!
2006-08-17 19:27:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by cindy c 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
My dad voted for him twice!!
But my mom voted for Kerry and Gore.
I probably would've voted for Bush too.
2006-08-17 19:40:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I must admit I did but it was not because I liked Bush but rather because I didn't want liberal judges put on the bench so that they could legislate their views instead of applying the law.
2006-08-17 19:53:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by remmo16 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
More than voted for that Kerry,so you were the minority back than if you voted Democrat. Bush won get over it and worry about something you understand.
2006-08-17 19:07:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Not me. I'll never vote for a republican like Bush who's a scumbag.
2006-08-17 19:03:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by tbone 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
i did. and i still think he was a much better alternative to Kerry and his cowardly cut and run theory. i always thought there was something shifty about someone who always had a "plan" but could never tell the people what his plan was
2006-08-18 12:22:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by thelogicalferret 5
·
0⤊
0⤋