English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Which tells us that this concept was around before the existence of the laws of Moses. Given that this simple concept has been proven by science (every action causes and equal and opposite reaction) why refute it?

2006-08-17 10:32:01 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

5 answers

I'm not so sure that the concept is demonized.
Perhaps you interrupted this differently?
I, for one, consider that we don't have the insight our Divine Creator has, and therefore are able to only see a portion of the greater truth.

Consider this (from link, below):
"The answer is relativity. The apparent duality is a result of the point of view of the observer, in this case ourselves. If we were able to look at the universe through God's glasses, as it were, we would find that the view was totally unchanged by creation. Just as there was nothing out there before creation other than God, there is nothing there now. This may be incomprehensible to us, but that is the declaration we make when we state that God is One."

2006-08-17 10:46:21 · answer #1 · answered by docscholl 6 · 1 0

A rather ridiculous comparision, if you ask me. Newtons law isn't one of "good" vs "bad". And, as you've mistakenly quoted, it isn't "equal AND opposite"; it's "equal OR opposite". In other words, the result needn't necessarily be opposed to the original force, just a resulting force.

I'd study more physics and theology before posting questions like this.

cheerio

2006-08-17 10:40:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

its duality not in the form of science but rather in the form of theology.

Zooaustrians (who were around at that time) believed in a god of good and a god of evil and the constantly fight each other. The G-d in the Torah is one that is in control of both good and evil.

2006-08-17 10:37:24 · answer #3 · answered by Gamla Joe 7 · 1 0

Can you cite some examples in the Torah? I need to read it in context before I can even consider a knowlegable answer.

2006-08-17 10:38:06 · answer #4 · answered by ziz 4 · 0 0

Wrong duality.

2006-08-17 11:01:16 · answer #5 · answered by ysk 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers