If American Liberals spent as much time, effort and money trying to solve problems instead of lobbying for the rest of the country to do it and pay for it... would they be further ahead with their agenda?
With the labor force of 59 million Kerry voters and the millions and millions spent by/on the party and other special interest lobbys it seems as though they could have built homes for all the homeless and fed them, found jobs for those on welfare or paid for their housing and food, put up free-clinics, raised money for the healthcare of the needy... instead it was all wasted?
(serious answers please)
2006-08-17
09:47:14
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Civic Participation
"Be the change you want to see in the world." - vs getting others to do it for you.
2006-08-17
09:48:01 ·
update #1
I'm not Republican.
2006-08-17
10:03:21 ·
update #2
No Reesa R you idiot, that did not answer my question. You only re-enforced my concern. "Where was/is Bush,etc. when it comes to helping the poor in New Orleans rebuild their community?" - The question was WHERE WERE YOU!?!?!?
2006-08-17
10:06:10 ·
update #3