Yo Tofu Jesus! Where you been man! Ive missed your thought provoking questions!!
I cannot agree more. Jesus was a closet homo anyway...... never marrried, hung out wearing flowing robes and sandals, kicked it with 12 other single guys and told them to eat his body.....yup, definitly homoerotic!!!
2006-08-17 09:49:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by YDoncha_Blowme 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Very correct. The path to God is Love, not hate, judement or condemnation. Love is always the answer and always acceptable to God. Jesus was also a truthful messenger, and himself demonstrated applying the principles of Love to all, even those who were considered transgressers by societal convention.
But what makes you think sex in any form would be unacceptable? Jesus may have chosen a path that abstained from sex (or not if you believe the DaVinci Code), but he was admittedly here on a special purpose and that decision was his. That doesn't mean that God views sex as evil. Why would he? He is the Creator of All and the ultimate source of Love and Joy in the cosmos. How could a perfect, loving, all-powerful Creator look at any part of his creation where Love is the primary force and think bad of it?
Which also doesn't mean that negative attitudes and behaviours towards ANY facet of our relationships with our other selves would be without negative impacts. The law of "as you sow so shall yea reap" still applies, but Love between two people, or the entire human race, is how we work towards the Love of God.
2006-08-17 09:57:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Elmer R 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
im not entirely sure what your point is. R u saying that its ok to love in a homosexual relationship but not to have sex? The two go hand and hand. Making love is the way we express our love to each other, gay or straight. I highly doubt the Jesus had a problem with sex.
2006-08-17 09:47:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by arielsalom33 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
First, sadly, I have to get Blowme's back on this one - marriage can only be between two consenting parties. If one is not capable of consenting (like a dog or 12 year old girl or such), then they can't get married.
Second, God would never have a problem with love and why on earth would anyone want to limit the amount of love on this planet when there is already so much violence and hate?
2006-08-17 10:00:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Phoenix, Wise Guru 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I have to agree with you that you can have love and not have sex. love is not sex. but I do have to disagree with you with your statement that says, "jesus loves all love, and no sex (for pleasure).
God is the creator of sex as long as it was between a male and female. It was to be a precious gift to the other partner. the whole book song of solomon is about a husband and wife having sex. it doesnt have to be just for procreation. It also says in the new testament that the man is suppose to please his wife and the wife to please her husband.
when jesus made that statement, he was wanting people to show love to others that was described in 1corinthians 13.
2006-08-17 09:57:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by just forgiven 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is not any compulsion and coercion in regard to faith. the final ingredient has been made distinctive from the incorrect ingredient:now whoever rejects taghut and believes in Allah has taken a company help that on no account supplies way. And Allah (Whose help he's taking) hears each and every thing and is often used with each and every thing. Allah is the Helper and Protector of people who have self assurance in Him: He brings them out of the depths of darkness into the easy. As for the disbelievers, they have taghut as their buyer, who drives them out of sunshine into the depths of darkness. those are the human beings who're doomed to the hearth, wherein they shall stay for ever.
2016-09-29 09:25:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i am female. i love my female friends, without wanting to have a sexual relationship with them. would you call me homosexual? look, the word sex can be found in homoSEXual. just admit it...homosexuality has to do with sex and nothing else. if you love people for who they are, that has nothing to do with sexuality, hetero or homo. Marriage is many things, not all of them are about love.
2006-08-17 09:50:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I will accept this if you accept that Homesexual Love is then the same a Brother to Brother or Cousin to Cousin Love.....in which case I will be going to the Supreme Court for discrimination, as I love my dog....and I want him to have Health benefits the same as a Homosexual Lover...get it??????????
Hey Ydoncha_Blowme...Y doncha Blow me??? Christian me??? Ha that would be the day...maybe if people like you realized the garbage you are promoting by allowing sigs like the Homo's to spout "their right" we wouldn't be in a lot of the mess were currently in...but you are too much of a dumb-*** to conceive something of the big-picture aren't you? How about my Brother or Cousin consenting? Are they now allowed Spousal Benefits? Same as a Homo Partner...NOT!!!I of course just by yer name says who you really are....scum-o-the-earth.....
2006-08-17 09:49:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Gurn B 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Sex and love are two completely different things.
2006-08-17 09:55:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, Jesus was a good person. Very tolerant, very forgiving. It's almost sad that his followers have corrupted his message so much.
2006-08-17 09:44:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by drink_more_powerade 4
·
1⤊
0⤋