Surely they deserve some reward, and good looks don't come cheap. Before you say anything, I said "they", not "we". I am fairly ugly and wouldn't expect to benefit from such a tax exemption.
2006-08-17 09:06:14 · 7 answers · asked by Oracle Of Delphi 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
hell motha ****** no. thats totally ridiculous. you are a dumbass.
2006-08-17 09:28:21 · answer #1 · answered by mdt 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Good looks? for God's sake, it's preposterous! To state in accordance with the law, we are all obliged to pay what the government mandates, unless there are exemptions and conditional taxes that are also stated by the law. People who are poor and scholars are the ones who should pay less taxes or in some lawful cases, no tax at all. We are all the same, simply citizens of our government, and I tell you they would never base taxes on looks. To finally add, many good looking people especially models/superstars earn so much money, they should therefore pay more taxes, by that they can even help their government by paying their taxes faithfully.
2006-08-17 17:57:37 · answer #2 · answered by deutsch_rj 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Don't you think good looks are their own reward? I would suggest that beautiful people should pay MORE taxes as their path in life is much easier than that of an ugly person.
2006-08-17 16:17:16 · answer #3 · answered by Goose&Tonic 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Intelligence > Looks. Scholars should pay less tax.
2006-08-17 16:30:06 · answer #4 · answered by Black Sabbath 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They already receive much more by being "beautiful". . .so the answer is no.
2006-08-17 19:58:29 · answer #5 · answered by kobacker59 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No do you think that would be fair. Thats stupid
2006-08-18 01:30:04 · answer #6 · answered by Just wondering 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
SURE PRETTY-BOY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
U DON'T OWE A-THING!!!!!!!!!!!
;) ;) :)
2006-08-17 16:43:19 · answer #7 · answered by bobby-bob 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋