English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

May be the apostle tried to say erection while people understood resurrection.... What was supposed to be a biological miracle of dead man's erection has become dead mans resurrection…. May be Christians want try and answer this question

2006-08-17 08:26:28 · 10 answers · asked by 100Hertz 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

10 answers

The only people who could read and write in Biblical times were highly educated people. Many politicians, even, couldn't read and write but had educated scribes to do it for them. It is highly unlikely that one of those who could read and write--Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Saint Paul, et al., was as deficient in spelling as you are.

Why do I say you are deficient when your grammar and spelling is a little above passable? Because only a complete idiot could even conceive of a misspelling of "resurrection" as "erection." There is only the "-rection" sequentially in common. That is, only the root and the suffix.

Anyway, the Bible was not initially written in English, which makes your question doubly sad.

2006-08-17 08:35:15 · answer #1 · answered by Gestalt 6 · 0 0

Virgin beginning - none. Many remember incredible births, yet all of them contain sex (for this reason no virgin in touch) or being born from an inanimate merchandise (which i wager might want to technically be a virgin, yet i doesn't say the time period applies there) Ressurection is uncommon besides. truly, the theory that different religions that predate Christianity have similar elements (the "Jesus-fable speculation") has merely about 0 following or understand between historians. it truly is popularly perpetuated by technique of the web, yet so is wise layout "theory", and it is merely as a lot gibberish.

2016-11-25 22:49:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I just said a prayer for you. I hope you move from your current misinformed state into a realm that knows that God is love, and ignorant statements have no place in a forum like this.

2006-08-17 08:40:08 · answer #3 · answered by Odell 2 · 0 0

well its resurrection because he rose form the dead not did his penis only rise again all of him rose again. so there for it is NOT erection and only resurrection. ok. well good luck on your next odd questions for christianity try harder next time...

2006-08-17 08:34:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Actually, that is entirely possible. People often get erections while being asphyxiated, and its possible that Jesus died of asphyxiation while on the cross. Really, wouldn't this be more logical?

2006-08-17 08:33:55 · answer #5 · answered by reverenceofme 6 · 1 0

Blasphemer!

2006-08-17 08:31:46 · answer #6 · answered by Preacher 6 · 1 0

YOU'RE trying to correct their spelling and grammar! LOL, that's so funny!

2006-08-17 08:46:11 · answer #7 · answered by daisyk 6 · 0 0

reported

2006-08-17 08:31:31 · answer #8 · answered by Grandma Susie 6 · 1 0

Now that is something to think about.

2006-08-17 08:31:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

if stupid were sunlight, you would shine for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles and miles away

2006-08-17 08:32:37 · answer #10 · answered by Hafeman 5000 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers