English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...or else, would left-handers be sinners if Jesus were proved to have been a right-hander?

And if you say no, why give more importance to other accessory and irrelevant details about Jesus's life, like his alleged virginity? How does either his virginity or his right-handedness (or left-handedness) influence on his alleged good deeds?

2006-08-17 08:26:19 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Hey, if he was ambidexterous, 95 % of the population are screwed!

2006-08-17 08:39:34 · update #1

11 answers

Well, He was a man, so by that logic, all women are sinners. The misogynist peanut gallery need not comment.

2006-08-17 08:35:13 · answer #1 · answered by rag dollie 5 · 4 0

in the olden days if you were left-handed it was a sign of the devil in you so right handers have sinned left handers by being prejudiced against them. {i use that term loosely.}

only left handers are in their right mind because of the way your brain works!

2006-08-17 17:19:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

He's caused enough trouble among the left and right footers

2006-08-17 16:10:29 · answer #3 · answered by David R 5 · 0 0

It may not have any relevance if he was/wasn't a virgin. The fact that he was born from a virgin and led a sinless life and died for our sins is relevant.

2006-08-17 15:37:17 · answer #4 · answered by Charles B 4 · 0 1

If it could be proved that he was real instead of a work of science fiction then that would be a start

2006-08-17 15:36:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Jesus was ambidexterous.

2006-08-17 15:36:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Jesus! who knows!

2006-08-17 15:32:01 · answer #7 · answered by lady_in_blue_109 3 · 0 1

i would just be happy with the fact that Jesus' existence has been proven!!

2006-08-17 15:32:53 · answer #8 · answered by Crimsonite 2 · 0 1

No, and his virginity was important because it showed that he was pure.

2006-08-17 15:35:23 · answer #9 · answered by Dawn 4 · 0 2

Haha- very good question. Obv I don't know the answer.........

2006-08-17 15:35:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers