2006-08-17 00:54:05 · 9 answers · asked by Joe K 6 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Commuting
Assuming the engineering for that tunnel or bridge is good and that there are a lot of gas stations along the way, I might do it just to say I did it. Flying is definitely faster.
2006-08-17 09:52:51 · answer #1 · answered by potatochip 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe, if the tunnel has windows that I can see the ocean.
But I hope there is no bridge or tunnel to Hawaii, coz terrorists will try to blow that up and kill more americans and other innocent people.
2006-08-17 02:17:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i live in the UK, so the bridge or tunnel would have to be massive, and i probably run out of fuel 1/8 of the way across it, and it would take forever to drive too, so no
2006-08-17 01:50:08 · answer #3 · answered by caprilover79 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't really like the thought of it, l don't even fancy the Channel Tunnel and that would be much shorter, don't like that closed in feeling and being surrounded by water.
2006-08-17 01:00:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
we have tunnel between us and France whats the difference
2006-08-17 00:59:13 · answer #5 · answered by Alik411 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you kidding!? You would miss the hula girls passing out leis after getting off the plane!
2006-08-17 00:59:56 · answer #6 · answered by Sean M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sounds like a great road trip, albeit a bit limited on scenery
2006-08-17 03:40:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It would take too long. I would rather fly.
2006-08-17 01:03:37 · answer #8 · answered by bighampjr 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don`t know maybe or definately yes.....
2006-08-18 01:44:21 · answer #9 · answered by Yannis K 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋