Since God's is an intelligent form of energy, I rather doubt we would be clones. We represent want is best about God along with the right of freewill. As for cloning, consider Jesus who took sin from the world. He had all the same Genetic makeup as the man who brought it into the world. He would be a closer clone than anyone. And remember, scientist have not fared well in cloning. They have not create an exact copy of the original, to date. They have the same DNA, but the clones have never looked the same as the original, and they have aged very rapidly, dying much earlier than a normal time span. Further, even with cloning, they have to begin with living material. They cannot infuse the energy (spirit) of life into any dead or dried material.
2006-08-16 21:51:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cloning is something childish.
Since man can never create a living cell, some people imagine that the UFO's beings were cloning the human race! Then do the UFO's beings exist and who created them? And still these people claim their imagination to be scientific.
While in reality, the creation of the boundless physical universe and the more mysterious world of creation is something required a supreme wisdom; and the wisest teachers of mankind (Moses, Christ, Baha'u'llah...) repeatedly confirmed that this Supreme Wisdom is the One True God. Who are we to keep on argueing with those Divine Educators?
2006-08-16 22:02:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Practice makes a man perfect
GOD needs no practice. Cloning is the word that I will use to describe his powers. It much more than that.
Yes, humans have reached place where they can have clones, so I think there almost near to 1 % of what GOD is capable of doing.
2006-08-16 21:40:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by James B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think God created us to match his own mirror image...rather, humans have created an image of God and Godesses to look like men and women ! God made us similar, but did not clone us, it is us who clone ourselves by following fashion trends and religious fads blindly !! Lol...
2006-08-16 23:14:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Nisha 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you werent being silly I would explain what the image of God means. But the simple answer is no we are not clones.
2006-08-16 21:36:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by djmantx 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
God is not a person, He is a spirit. He did not clone us because we each differ in special ways, He simply created us in His image.
2006-08-16 21:37:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by xtcgurl123 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If God created guy in his very own photograph, then guy shows us what God is like, marvelous? What you're announcing is, if God is benevolent and guy is malevolent, then guy isn't made in God's photograph. it rather is logical. yet what I say is, God created guy with the means for unwell, and positively there would nicely be no longer something in advent which does not encompass polar opposites. I nevertheless have faith that guy is made in a twin of god ... and woman too, and that tells you lots approximately what God is like. distinctive from how maximum Christians think of him, I fancy.
2016-12-14 07:06:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by yakel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dude, He INVENTED it. =)
Less jokingly, there is a difference between being made in the image of something, and being copied and pasted.
I.E. I can make a block of wood into the image of a lion, but is it the same thing?
2006-08-16 21:37:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Benanen 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If god created man in his own image. And man came from ape, Is god a ape?
2006-08-16 21:38:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by myothernewname 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Don't take it literally, image does not mean nose and eyes. and NO we are not clones.
2006-08-16 21:41:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by alya m 3
·
0⤊
0⤋