English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

let me help you NONE. NONE. NONE.

2006-08-16 17:54:59 · 19 answers · asked by Work In Progress 3 in Politics & Government Civic Participation

ohhh they do have a plan but kerry voted for it then against it, kennedy was too drunk to say anything so the all agreed to form a plan to form a I hate bush plan then kerry flip floped again and vote to support that plan.

2006-08-16 18:06:37 · update #1

19 answers

They plan on stopping the war. They will bring our troops home.

They will feel good about this.

They will try to plant trees in the mideast.

They will try to talk terrorist out of their silly ways...oh those dems can talk now can't they...

8 years will go by...a Republican will be in office and the attacks will come...

The liberals will be like...oh dear...here we go again...how can we further reduce our military strengh? Because we are a liberal nation...yucky weapons strength is sooooo Reagan....hey, pass me one of those coffees of the day....yum.....

2006-08-16 18:06:25 · answer #1 · answered by cypress9silver 2 · 3 2

Lol, Western guy has the purely good answer to this question, and he's thoroughly genuinely. they opt for to guard you from your self and the international on account that you're too stupid to get excitement from the complexity of what's sturdy or incorrect, or what's sweet for you. purely good bypass away the Aristocrats (i.e. "liberals" or more beneficial perfect yet condescending leftists) to the agency agency of starting to be to be the "complicated" judgements in existence and society and enable the 1000's purely drone away at mundane jobs mutually as they journey superficial happiness. some Black lady is the epitome of what freedoms and options leftists help, and that is about each and every of the guy liberties that they help. surely, Jose Ortega, leftist hi-jacked the decision back interior the early 1900's even as political philosophers broke up the time period liberalism into 2 categories, classical liberalism and welfare liberalism, with the objective to inform aside both philosophies. before, what we call classical liberalism, grew to develop into purely referred to as liberalism. Now the nearest ingredient to classical liberalism is libertarianism. All definitions and labels by ability of US criteria. As somebody else said, those labels propose particularly some topics in Asia, and also Europe.

2016-11-04 23:56:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Seems like you have already made up your mind,regardless of what anyone else says. But if you are actually interested answer...

They think that the first priority is to secure our own ports of entry, and to do that we need our troops at home rather than playing babysitter for countries engaged in civil war.

If our troops are rested and ready to deploy, then they can face actual threats as they appear, rather than hoping that the only threat happens to come from either Iraq or Afghanistan.

Their focus is to use resources wisely, not carelessly, and to have our troops adequately prepared when they are needed, rather that committed to an indefinite long-term deployment that is doubtful as to its effectiveness for any American goals.

They think the surveillance is good, but must be done according to established laws. And that there is nothing that is being done now that couldn't be done under existing laws. Before you argue that point, check the laws yourself and you'll see that's an accurate statement.

2006-08-16 18:49:19 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2 1

Call me Tired of Conservatives. Apparently, the liberals/Dems/progressives have a better idea than what bush is doing. I don't remember Clinton having our country bombed on American soil, so he must have done something correct. Seems that someone knew about 9/11, but did nothing about it. Seems that someone went to Iraq for no reason & without finishing the job in Afghanistan. Seems someone STILL HASN'T CAUGHT BIN LADEN. Seems someone was about TO SELL OUR SEAPORTS TO ARAB LEADERS TIED TO TERRORISM. Seems someone has not done anything about the economy in this country except put it more and more in debt. However, the conservatives/Repubicans/Neo-cons have been in control of government for 6 years and all of this is happening.

Don't ask what the liberals would do, ask why YOUR government isn't doing what it is suppose to do.

2006-08-16 18:05:56 · answer #4 · answered by linus_van_pelt68 4 · 1 1

Well EXCUUUUUUUUUSE ME.

I thought that getting the entire world to hate America was the worst thing you could do to protect the U.S., but I guess I was wrong. I guess tolerance and democracy are really killing the Land of Freedom.

Jeezus.

Yea, we do have a plan. First off, DONT MAKE PEOPLE WANT TO KILL US!! Something you have already failed in my good right winging friend. Second, HAVE A PLAN. As in, try to keep the army where it's supposed to be protecting, etc. Don't invest in weapons that will kill innocents. Etc, etc. I'm no strategist or political insider.

I will SCREAM the next time some right winger says I don't want to protect my own home, or that I can't, or that I'm not patriotic because I *gasp* excercise my free speech rights of dissention.

SCREEEEAAAAAM!!!!

2006-08-16 18:33:02 · answer #5 · answered by Poison 2 · 1 2

In order to knwo what the liberals/progressives have planned you actually have to read something. You will not get it from mainstream media, which only covers sound bites. You won't get it here, the answer you choose as correct will be the one that best agrees with you. So why bother asking the question - too lazy to look for the information yourself?

2006-08-17 01:16:42 · answer #6 · answered by ash 7 · 1 1

Okay, the troops are in Iraq to secure the oil fields. There ARE NO BANDS OF TERRORISTS waitng for their chance to strike us. However Bush and Cheney have created more terrorists, or as I like to call them, People bombed out of their homes and livelihoods or have watched friends and family members horrifically bombed to pieces. bin Laden did not do WTC. That was our Pearl Harbor created and executed by the Administration, The Navy (The George Washington Nuclear Carrier) and the CIA to shake up Americans and allow them to go after the OIL. THE OIL. THE OIL. THE OIL. THE OIL. THE OIL.. Doesn't #3,25 gasoline bother any of you? That price is a direct product of Bush/Cheny's scare machine. Period.

2006-08-16 19:01:19 · answer #7 · answered by isacoydog 2 · 0 2

Hey...I know...let's Nuke Iran. Go get 'em Georgie, you puddinghead! There are still about 150 people in the world who do not hate us because of your stupidity. That should take care of that and then you will have proven once and for all that you are a better man than your daddy and mommy will love you best.

2006-08-17 04:07:42 · answer #8 · answered by wheels 4 · 1 1

not only do they not have a plan to protect the US, they have no concrete plans for any other issue either.

for example, for all their concern about global warming, the dems have yet to put up a concrete proposal for how to cut carbon emissions without destroying the U.S. economy. all they do is gripe about how Bush hasn't done enough.

the entire democrat platform is "we hate republicans" - all vitriol and no substance. if the dems come into power in 2006/2008 i will laugh (when i'm not busy being scared for my personal safety), because the democratic farce will be revealed for what it is.

2006-08-16 18:03:43 · answer #9 · answered by JoeSchmoe06 4 · 1 2

To say that Liberals or Progressives do not have a plan to protect the USA is ridiculous. I cannot believe you blindly forget the power of hugs and love waves. That coupled with turning a blind eye to threats will certainly keep us safe in the future...NOT.

2006-08-16 18:02:29 · answer #10 · answered by James H 3 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers