If somebody launch NUCLEAR strikes to Ka'abah in Mecca and Vatican City in Rome, will we have World War III?

Question

Who knows? Concept of Jihad and Crusades Wars... I strongly believe somebody will misuse these issues to annihilate the "infidels" out there(!)

What do you think then? And no rude, offensive comments here please!! I've been sick enough to hear much profanity while talking about religion... especially about Israel, Jews, and Moslems....

Answer 1

That's a little like saying, "If somebody shoots someone, then will we have violence?"

Or, "If there is a huge rain pour, will we get too much rain".

Would you characterize two nuclear weapon detonations on two different continents as "peace"?

Yes, obviously at that point someone has started a war and someone will have to end it, except in one unique circumstance.

The need to end it would not come from the Vatican or Mecca to defend themselves if they got vaporized.

Depending on the circumstances, other countries might need to step in - not out of revenge but simply to disarm whoever did it, if it was done by mad bomber pyscho types. It still could not be a worldwide war though.

Geographically dispersed countries would have to throw in their lots with the mad bomber to make it a world war. Not a particularly likely outcome.

However, in the unique situation where the both the Vatican and Mecca decided to detonate their own nuclear weapons in their own cities, the threat would have eliminated itself.

Other countries would simply have to avoid the area and deal with any long range fallout in that case.

All of these things seem extremely unlikely. If the risk worries you, you can work out on paper what could cause it to happen, how likely those things are, and what further consequences there would be.

Take a look at Bayesian trees. They are mostly used for fault analysis but you could use them to model theoretical disasters or catastrophic situations.

Answer 2

That act of a nuclear attack by one nation against any other nation can not be localized. It would be a matter of time before every other nation would be affected by water, ground and air contamination.

There would be no victor in any nuclear attack by any nation. The globe would suffer. So, if nuts and lunatics like North Korea. Iran, etc. ever launched a nuclear attack, who would mop up in the aftermath.

The United States dropped two atomic bombs to end the war in the Pacific to end World War II and it took billions of dollars in relief to bring some aid to Japan. It was needed and it was necessary. There are those amongst us who feel that was a mistake.

But, the point is, we recognized the damaged and sent in aid, immediately. If Iran or North Korea launched a nuclear attack, does anyone think Iran/North Korea will provide any degree of aftercare. I doubt it very much.

Answer 3

Any country sending out nuclear weapons at this time will lead to WWIII.
Like was said the US used if on Japan but at that time there were only a few countries with nuclear capabilities.
I beilieve someone will drop one by September 12, 2006.
I read it on the web. The site had great scriptual evidence.

Answer 4

I can't believe that you don't already know the answer to that question.
The answer is YES.
Do you really think that 3 countries could be nuked and it not be WWIII?

Answer 5

no but if you destroy neverland then the armagadden will be on our ****. just kidding
i think the whole world will go to hell if that were to happen, buddy.
pray that it doesn't.

Answer 6

I think so.
http://www.catholicplanet.com/future/map.htm
http://www.catholicprophecy.org/prophecy.html
http://www.icubed.com/~rpoe/endtimes.htm

Answer 7

We might not have much left if that happened.

Answer 8

Oh, yes! If you destroy the Black Rock , that is the end.

Answer 9

That can not happen