English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

THIS NEOCON IS DEFENDING WHY HALIBURTON WAS THE ONLY COMPANY THAT CAN REBUILD IRAQI OIL AND DESERVED THE $1BILLION NO-BID CONTRACT FROM BUSH....

"There are no other companies capable of the infrastructure rebuilding that Haliburton can do. Not one. Anywhere in the world."

WHAT ABOUT?

BECHTEL, FLUOUR, THE PARSONS GROUP, SCHLUMBERGER AND FOSTER WHEELER?

DUMBASS NEOCON....

2006-08-16 12:12:42 · 12 answers · asked by Sock it to you 1 in Politics & Government Military

So, splitting the profits among different companies would solve the problem?
I think that then they would just refer to the other companies as evil as well

WHAT DA HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? I'M SAYING ANY OF THE ABOVE COMPANIES CAN DO WHAT HALIBURTON IS DOING IN IRAQ. BUT THEY WERE NEVER GIVEN THAT CHANCE BECAUSE BUSH & CHENEY PREVENTED THEM FROM BIDDING, WHICH WOULD'VE SAVED US TAXPAYERS AT LEAST $500 MILLION. I KNOW THAT'S A DROP IN THE BUCKET COMPARED TO TRILLIONS THAT BUSH ALREADY SPENT IN IRAQ BUT IT'S STILL TAX PAYER MONEY.

2006-08-16 12:29:17 · update #1

well, dumbass, haliburton owns bechtel,

BECHTEL ISN'T OWNED BY HALIBURTON, YOU STUPID F U C K!

LOOK HERE AND TELL US WHERE IT LISTS BECHTEL AS PART OF HALIBURTON http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Halliburton_subsidiaries

and the other ones are foreign.

FOSTER WHEELER IS A US COMPANY, YOU F U C K I N G IDIOT!!!!!!!! A COMPANY THAT HOLDS MOST OF THE LICENSE FOR MANY PETROLEUM AND PETROCHEMICAL PROCESSES!

do you want all those billions of dollars going to a foreign company that pays no US taxes
? then it costs twice as much.

STUPID F U C K... HOW DOES OVER 5 COMPANIES BIDDING FOR A JOB COST TWICE AS MUCH, YOU S T U P I D FU CK!!!!! THIS ISN'T EBAY WHERE THE TOP BIDDER WINS, YOU F U CKING RETARD.. THE LOWEST BID WINS. DUMBFU CK.

2006-08-16 12:43:04 · update #2

12 answers

you obviously don't know anything either:
In support of the U.S. government's reconstruction effort in Iraq, Bechtel is under contract with the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), for the emergency repair, rehabilitation, and reconstruction of critical elements of Iraq’s infrastructure. Bechtel's initial contract, which is complete, includes assessing and repairing selected power, municipal water, and sewage systems; dredging, repairing, and upgrading the Port of Umm Qasr; rehabilitating selected schools, clinics, and fire stations; reconstructing three key bridges; constructing a key rail line; restoring telephone service to more than 200,000 Baghdad subscribers; and restoring Iraq's main 2,000-kilometer, north-south fiber optic communications backbone.

still here fool
London, United Kingdom (17 February 2004) – AMEC, the international engineering services company, will play an important role in the restoration of Iraq following the award of work worth US$154 million to Fluor Corporation, on which AMEC will act as prime subcontractor. The work, which involves restoration of damaged power generation, transmission and distribution systems, positions AMEC well for future restoration contracts and reflects the company’s status as the UK’s largest and most experienced engineering services business.

now for parsons

If we only count the money since New Year's Day, there is first of all the Jan. 6 contract for $1.8 Billion from USAID. The package, known as "Iraq Infrastructure II" is a sexy three-way partnership between Parsons, Bechtel, and Horne to build electricity, water, sewer, airport, seaport, schools, "selected ministry buildings," and more.

do i need to go on haliburton was not the only company to get contracts.
stop believing all the liberal democratic crap and open your eyes.

2006-08-16 12:27:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

1. Are the other companies able to fulfill the contract?

2. Are the other companies available to fulfill the contract?

3. Did the other companies even want to fulfill the contract?

4. If you notice; Bechtel, Fluour, Parsons, Schlumberger, Foster Wheeler, Boeing Services Co and Lockheed Services Co are not SCREAMING about this business arrangement.

5. Why do you think that is? Given the size of the contract, one would think that a competitor would raise an objection. And if you think that Bechtel does not have enough muscle to ensure fair treatment from the government, you are more misguided than I originally thought.

2006-08-16 19:54:49 · answer #2 · answered by JAMES11A 4 · 1 0

well, dumbass, haliburton owns bechtel, and the other ones are foreign. do you want all those billions of dollars going to a foreign company that pays no US taxes
? then it costs twice as much.

2006-08-16 19:29:11 · answer #3 · answered by iberius 4 · 0 0

So, splitting the profits among different companies would solve the problem?
I think that then they would just refer to the other companies as evil as well

2006-08-16 19:21:42 · answer #4 · answered by Austin 3 · 0 0

You must be new at this Yahoo Answer thing! You clicked the ASK section - that's where you ask a question, not vent all of the bile in your closed mind.

2006-08-16 21:56:34 · answer #5 · answered by Mike K 3 · 0 0

you can add about another dozen to that list If you include Asian companies. you are right about this. It is the most blatant act of patronization seen anywhere in recent history.

2006-08-16 19:27:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Go back to your chat room. Yahoo Answers is for posting questions, not rants. I told you this already.

2006-08-16 19:22:10 · answer #7 · answered by *~HoNeYBeE~* 5 · 2 0

Winner of the Frothing-At-The-Mouth-Award for NEOHALFWITS.

Ran out of your Lithium eh?

2006-08-17 07:15:26 · answer #8 · answered by kristycordeaux 5 · 0 0

Wow. Have a burrito and relax.

2006-08-16 19:42:44 · answer #9 · answered by Pancakes 7 · 0 0

You seem to have a effen problem, What is your question????

2006-08-16 19:19:00 · answer #10 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers