2 Corinth 5:16
16Wherefore henceforth know we no man after the flesh: yea, though we have known Christ after the flesh, yet now henceforth know we him no more.
2 John 1:6-8
6And this is love, that we walk after his commandments. This is the commandment, That, as ye have heard from the beginning, ye should walk in it.
7For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.
8Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward.
2006-08-16 10:18:21 · 9 answers · asked by Bold writer 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
YES he is whichever name you call him.
2006-08-16 10:34:04 · answer #1 · answered by zaki1968 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Literal translation is:
2Jo 1:7 Because many deceivers went out into the world, those not confessing Jesus Christ TO HAVE come in the flesh, this is the deceiver and the antichrist.
Paul did not deny this "though we have known Christ after the flesh". Christ was no longer in the flesh because He died to the flesh/law/old covenant and was raised as the firstfruit of the spirit and mediator of the new covenant.
2006-08-16 10:31:55 · answer #2 · answered by Colts fan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In your quote from 1 Corinthians Paul was confirming that Jesus Christ was not just a spirit but came in the flesh, and we could know him as a real person.
In the 2 letter of John, John was speaking about the heresy of of Gnosticism. The Gnostics were deceiving people into believing that Jesus Christ could not have come in the flesh. Gnostics believed that the flesh (body) was corrupt.
So both quotes are really saying the same thing.
2006-08-16 10:37:28 · answer #3 · answered by Dr. D 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sorry I could not read all your quotes but to be honest Saul was a phatasy he had the training of a pharasy and he called himself the worst of all. but after he Jeesus spoke to him he was able to fee how Jewsus fallfilled the prophasys as he knew the, well but I will say in my opinion his letter still show some of his Jewish teaching and we must remember each of the letters was written to a spacific curch at that time with there own problems they were not writen as general letters to aply to every one to understand his letters you need to read acts and conect them to the time and place
2006-08-16 10:26:55 · answer #4 · answered by Sam's 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Paul is the corrupter of the message of Jesus, which resulted in the trinity, and the law being abandoned
2006-08-16 10:25:39 · answer #5 · answered by abdulaziiz 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Both: YES!
I actually think he hit his head a little too hard when he fell from his horse...maybe it was brain damage or psychosis.
He was also very SEXIST!
2006-08-16 10:24:45 · answer #6 · answered by Noi 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Saul: Yes.
Paul: No.
2006-08-16 10:23:13 · answer #7 · answered by Rance D 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. Why would you conclude that?
2006-08-16 10:30:13 · answer #8 · answered by Randy G 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
k;hymgf
2006-08-16 10:52:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋